On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> Couldn't make the Cloud meeting but just skimmed the log;
> cross-posting to server@ list.
> How about combine Cloud and Server WGs into a new WG with three new sub
> hardware, cloud, atomic?
> That way you get the benefit of one WG working on the big picture
> stuff that enables integration among the outputs. And you get
> collaboration that isn't possible by just cross posting emails on two
> lists. Curation of the outputs is enhanced so they're optimal when the
> products are used together, while not being exclusive to each other.
> The differences are minor tweaks in terms of payload, but e.g.
> cloud-init is not something most people in the Server WG probably know
> much about. So most of Cloud + Server overlaps with really vertical
> knowledge base needed to do the small tweaks that cause substantial
> product differentiation.
> On the issue of membership, anyone unavailable in the next 30 days
> should be dropped. There will be another time for their participation
> when they're available. I'd look into making it easy to rotate out WG
> members to avoid long periods of inactivity which inhibits others'
> ability to get stuff done, and avoid burn out when they've been on the
> WG too long.
> Maybe some WG seats should be ~18 months, and twice as many of those
> would be 1 release cycle. i.e. 1/3 of the seats are longer term, and
> 2/3 are short term. There's sufficient stability in FESCo to make
> frequent WG turnover a plus.
Not a bad idea. There's a ton of overlap, and it sounds like there are
a lot of atomic-type plans afoot in the server group, and atomic is
fundamentally about servers.
> Chris Murphy
> cloud mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
cloud mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org