On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > On 08/02/2012 04:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> We are good to go with this folder. >> >> RAT report here: >> >> https://raw.github.com/chipchilders/asf_cloudstack_RAT_results/master/debian.txt >> >> The only exceptions are debian packaging files that don't support >> commenting (AFAIK). > > > Do we really need licenses in these files? Sounds to me like a bit of "over > licensing". > > These are just files to build the Debian packages with. > > Wido >
I'm assuming that we don't, but I'm just reporting what I can't easily fix as I go. My assumption is that we'll eventually get to a baseline level of "compliance" that includes a number of known exceptions within the RAT reports. These would be some of those exceptions. Another example: the certificate and key files. Once I get through all of the directories, we'll have a clear picture of (1) what are the outstanding issues that have to be dealt with, and (2) what are the "expected exceptions" that we'll agree to leave alone. Fair? -chip
