On 08/02/2012 04:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
On 08/02/2012 04:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
We are good to go with this folder.
RAT report here:
https://raw.github.com/chipchilders/asf_cloudstack_RAT_results/master/debian.txt
The only exceptions are debian packaging files that don't support
commenting (AFAIK).
Do we really need licenses in these files? Sounds to me like a bit of "over
licensing".
These are just files to build the Debian packages with.
Wido
I'm assuming that we don't, but I'm just reporting what I can't easily
fix as I go.
My assumption is that we'll eventually get to a baseline level of
"compliance" that includes a number of known exceptions within the RAT
reports. These would be some of those exceptions. Another example:
the certificate and key files.
Once I get through all of the directories, we'll have a clear picture
of (1) what are the outstanding issues that have to be dealt with, and
(2) what are the "expected exceptions" that we'll agree to leave
alone.
Fair?
Yes, sounds fair to me :)
Wido
