However this means that if someone wants to build a system vm themselves (to add new packages for example), this fix will not be available.
On 8/3/12 1:43 PM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: >From the git log: >commit aeda3f3a1c64efa1deb34f7fcb280e4155c4fe7d >Author: Sheng Yang <sheng.y...@cloud.com> >Date: Wed Dec 28 17:35:09 2011 -0800 > > bug 11056: Add customized iptables and kernel modules to the system >template > > The new kernel module xt_CHECKSUM.ko is based on [1], and back ported >to 2.6.32 > kernel. New iptables is based on adding a new extension from [2]. > > [1]https://lwn.net/Articles/396466/ > >[2]https://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=iptables.git;a=commit;h= >9d1b11102b53103c00b7fddf4658a4d2bdee1338 > > status 11056: resolved fixed > > > >It fixes bug http://bugs.cloud.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11056, that >debina/ubuntu client can't get ip address in some cases. >It's ok to remove it from source tree, as the patched iptable binary >itself is already installed in system vm template. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:09 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: IPtables deb in source repo >> >> Hi folks: >> >> There's a deb for what I assume is a forked/modified copy of iptables >> in source: >> >> patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb >> >> Why is it here?; what if any changes were made to this?; when this >> gets deleted (iptables is GPL), does it create any problems for >> generating systemVMs? >> >> --David
