On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > We can put the binary into somewhere, but in the source code. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:13 PM >> To: CloudStack DeveloperList >> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo >> >> However this means that if someone wants to build a system vm >> themselves >> (to add new packages for example), this fix will not be available. >> >> On 8/3/12 1:43 PM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> >From the git log: >> >commit aeda3f3a1c64efa1deb34f7fcb280e4155c4fe7d >> >Author: Sheng Yang <sheng.y...@cloud.com> >> >Date: Wed Dec 28 17:35:09 2011 -0800 >> > >> > bug 11056: Add customized iptables and kernel modules to the >> system >> >template >> > >> > The new kernel module xt_CHECKSUM.ko is based on [1], and back >> ported >> >to 2.6.32 >> > kernel. New iptables is based on adding a new extension from [2]. >> > >> > [1]https://lwn.net/Articles/396466/ >> > >> >[2]https://git.netfilter.org/cgi- >> bin/gitweb.cgi?p=iptables.git;a=commit;h= >> >9d1b11102b53103c00b7fddf4658a4d2bdee1338 >> > >> > status 11056: resolved fixed >> > >> > >> > >> >It fixes bug http://bugs.cloud.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11056, that >> >debina/ubuntu client can't get ip address in some cases. >> >It's ok to remove it from source tree, as the patched iptable binary >> >itself is already installed in system vm template.
Did we upstream the patch to debian? How will people generate new systemVMs without this (or will it just be broken for them) --David
