Here is the config that I use - eth0 = NAT adapter - eth1 = Host-In Adapter = Network 192.168.56.x
I have experienced the same issue as you. After reboot I was not able anymore to access internet. This is why I have put in comment the xenbr0 configuration in /etc/network.interfaces Regards, Charles On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2012, at 8:10 AM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Rohit, > > > > Can you answer to this question please ? Do I have to follow instructions > > here to configure NFS server ( > > > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#nfs-shares-on-management-server > ) > > ? > > > > Another thing that I would like to share. If we configure the Xenbr0 > > interface like this, then the machine is not able to connect to internet > > > > more /etc/network/interfaces > > # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system > > # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). > > > > # The loopback network interface > > auto lo > > iface lo inet loopback > > > > # The primary network interface > > auto eth0 > > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > > > auto xenbr0 > > iface xenbr0 inet dhcp > > bridge_ports eth0 > > > > auto eth1 > > iface eth1 inet static > > address 192.168.56.2 > > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > broadcast 192.168.56.255 > > gateway 192.168.56.1 > > > > Any idea is welcome ? > > > Charles, I presume that eth0 is attached to a bridge adapter in vbox and > that eth1 is attached to a host-only adapter in vbox ? > > I am having issues getting those two adapters to work simultaneously as > well. It seems to work the first time you set it up but not after your > reboot the machine. I tried with deleting > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rule to no avail. I believe it's a > vbox/OSX issue. > > -Sebastien > > > > > Regards, > > > > Charles > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> My question was more about --> Do I have to follow instructions here to > >> configure NFS server ( > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#nfs-shares-on-management-server > ) > >> ? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, hack and go through the .bash_history, setup systemvm template. > Then > >>> you're pretty much done as long as yout network won't fail you. > >>> Rest, you have already built and run mgmt server. Won't be much help. > >>> > >>> Regards. > >>> > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: Charles Moulliard [[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:00 PM > >>> To: cloudstack-dev > >>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? > >>> > >>> Hi Rohit, > >>> > >>> I progress. I have been able to install xen, configure network to > create a > >>> private network and also access to internet and nfs server is > >>> installed (apt-get > >>> install nfs-kernel-server). Do we have something more to do for NFS ? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Charles > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On 15-Nov-2012, at 7:12 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> As of ubuntu-11 is configured use xen, > >>>>> > >>>>> "As of Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric), the default kernel included in Ubuntu > >>> can > >>>> be > >>>>> used directly with the Xen hypervisor as the management (or control) > >>>> domain > >>>>> (Dom0 or Domain0 in Xen terminology). " > >>>>> > >>>>> why don't you create an image using it ? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I'm using this only. apt-get install xen-hypervisor and you're > >>> done. > >>>> To use xen, one just need to select the kernel with xen during booting > >>> on > >>>> grub. > >>>> If you're keep, hack ~/.bash_history from the DevCloud image, the > >>> history > >>>> will tell you what was performed to create devcloud. > >>>> > >>>> About pre-seeding systemvm template, see this: > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template > >>>> > >>>> You need to pre-seed, i.e. put a systemvm template on nfs with which > >>> your > >>>> systemvm, cpvm and domr are created. > >>>> > >>>> Regards. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Rohit Yadav < > [email protected] > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 15-Nov-2012, at 2:10 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Using VirtualBox R4.2.4 on MacOS 10.7.5 and the image ( > >>>>>>> http://bhaisaab.org/vms/ubuntu-12.04-x86-minimal-vm.tar.gz) that > >>> you > >>>>>>> provide, the OS does not boot (screen stays black). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oh :( > >>>>>> Will start with a new image today again. Will keep you posted. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Charles Moulliard < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Many thanks. What do you mean by "*Preseed a systemvm template and > >>> you > >>>>>>>> should be good to go. (2. is the tricky one)" ?* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, this one: > >>>>>> 2. Configure network such that it's accessible to the host os and > can > >>>>>> access Internet, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *I have started to create a google document to define step-by-step > >>>> what > >>>>>>>> do do.* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cool. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Rohit Yadav < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 14-Nov-2012, at 3:23 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Have you been able to finalize your work about creating a new > >>> Ubuntu > >>>>>>>>> image > >>>>>>>>>> for VirtualBox. If this is not the case, can you share with us > >>>>>>>>> (document, > >>>>>>>>>> ...) what you have done to configure Ubunttu (Installating > MySQL, > >>>>>>>>> Tomcat, > >>>>>>>>>> ....) ? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Alright I'm back online, will work on releasing a devcloud image > >>>> that I > >>>>>>>>> hope would work out of the box, after some code monkey duties > this > >>>>>> week. In > >>>>>>>>> the new image, mysql, tomcat, git etc. won't be installed on > >>>> devcloud. > >>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>> idea is that you develop on your host os, debug with your fav. > IDE > >>>> and > >>>>>> run > >>>>>>>>> mgmt server, mysql, jetty/tomcat as well (if you want to do that > >>> on > >>>>>>>>> devcloud that too you can do). The default image will have only > >>> the > >>>>>>>>> preconfigured network, xen (kvm won't run as pv hypervisor, I > >>> knew it > >>>>>>>>> required hvm/intel-vt or amd-v, and I still tried just to see > what > >>>>>> happens > >>>>>>>>> and it did not run) and nfs server. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I've already shared the base os, which is x86 ubuntu precise > >>>>>>>>> http://bhaisaab.org/vms/ubuntu-12.04-x86-minimal-vm.tar.gz(note: > >>>> this > >>>>>>>>> is not devcloud, just the base system which is stripped down and > >>>>>> archived, > >>>>>>>>> ~250MB) Till I do that, you may try to diy devcloud, the top > level > >>>>>> goals > >>>>>>>>> are to: 1. Install xen, 2. Configure network such that it's > >>>> accessible > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> the host os and can access Internet, 3. Install and configure > >>> NFS, 4. > >>>>>>>>> Preseed a systemvm template and you should be good to go. (2. is > >>> the > >>>>>> tricky > >>>>>>>>> one) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Just skip the following, something frivolous but for fun: > >>>>>>>>> Around devcloud, I'm experimenting a lot (slow internet, plus > >>> every > >>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>> I mess I start from a fresh copy) so not able to produce a final > >>>>>> image; you > >>>>>>>>> may call me crazy for what I'm going to share next: so I've a > >>>>>> raspberrypi > >>>>>>>>> with me (a dirt cheap small single board arm 32bit computer, 4 GB > >>>>>> sdcard, > >>>>>>>>> 512MB ram etc., http://www.raspberrypi.org and we know devcloud > >>> was > >>>>>>>>> cloud in a box, I'm trying to see if I can create a devpi or > >>>> basically > >>>>>>>>> devcloud but in hardware and not as a vm, basically cloud in your > >>>>>> pocket. I > >>>>>>>>> installed debian wheezy on it and xen pv for arm (xen > cloudplaform > >>>> for > >>>>>> arm, > >>>>>>>>> this just blows up, even after cpvm disabled, ssvm etc. would > just > >>>>>> blow it > >>>>>>>>> up), and this thing fails at the point when I restart it, also > the > >>>>>> default > >>>>>>>>> sd card (it's storage, think hdd) is small (4GB) and the disk io > >>> is > >>>>>> very > >>>>>>>>> small re-flashing it every time consumes a lot of my time, > >>> ordered a > >>>>>> 16GB > >>>>>>>>> class10 sd card for better disk io, will keep you posted how this > >>>>>>>>> experiment went, I've a gut feeling though this won't work given > >>> the > >>>>>>>>> resource constraints. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Charles > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Rohit Yadav < > >>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Not really, in my setup I want eth0 to be host-only which is > >>>> causing > >>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>>> issues; another problem is I'm making it x86 only, so I see few > >>>>>>>>> crashes. > >>>>>>>>>>> Will update when I'm done. > >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 9:06 PM > >>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Did you succeed it to fix the routing issues ? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rohit Yadav < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, it won't work as the vms inside host only network > >>> can > >>>>>> only > >>>>>>>>>>>> access the host os and other vms on it. Therefore devcloud > >>> inside > >>>>>>>>>>> host-only > >>>>>>>>>>>> network won't be able to reach the Internet. > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm actually trying to create a new devcloud image with two > >>>> network > >>>>>>>>>>>> adapters, one NAT (eth1, so devcloud is able to reach the > >>>> Internet) > >>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> one > >>>>>>>>>>>> host-only adapter (eth0, so we can run mgmt server etc.) and > it > >>>> will > >>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> only 300-350MB (archived). I was trying not the share the > >>> image, > >>>>>>>>> having > >>>>>>>>>>>> some routing issues when I do that, will share as soon I fix > >>> those > >>>>>>>>>>> issues. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rohit > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS. the base system is ubuntu x86 precise and the untouched > >>>> stripped > >>>>>>>>> down > >>>>>>>>>>>> vm is available here: http://bhaisaab.org/vms > >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 4:46 PM > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have been able to setup the bridged adapter on virtualbox to > >>>> allow > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> guest machine to get an IP address (from my DHCP server > >>> runinng in > >>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>> lan > >>>>>>>>>>>> : 192.168.1x). > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The guest is configured like this : > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# more > >>>> /etc/network/interfaces > >>>>>>>>>>>> # The loopback network interface > >>>>>>>>>>>> auto lo > >>>>>>>>>>>> iface lo inet loopback > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> # The primary network interface > >>>>>>>>>>>> auto xenbr0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> iface xenbr0 inet static > >>>>>>>>>>>> gateway 192.168.56.1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> address 192.168.56.2 > >>>>>>>>>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> bridge_ports eth0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> auto eth0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> iface eth0 inet static > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> auto eth1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> iface eth1 inet dhcp > >>>>>>>>>>>> *********************************** > >>>>>>>>>>>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:df:00:00 > >>>>>>>>>>>> inet addr:192.168.1.6 Bcast:192.168.1.255 > >>>>>>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fedf:0/64 Scope:Link > >>>>>>>>>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:7e:74:9c > >>>>>>>>>>>> inet addr:192.168.56.2 Bcast:192.168.56.255 > >>>>>>>>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe7e:749c/64 Scope:Link > >>>>>>>>>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> ************************************* > >>>>>>>>>>>> ip route > >>>>>>>>>>>> default via 192.168.56.1 dev xenbr0 metric 100 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src > >>>> 192.168.1.6 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.56.0/24 dev xenbr0 proto kernel scope link src > >>>>>>>>> 192.168.56.2 > >>>>>>>>>>>> ************************************** > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, DNS resolution still does not work. Is there > >>>>>> something > >>>>>>>>>>> else > >>>>>>>>>>>> to do ? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# wget > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > http://be.mirror.eurid.eu/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso > >>>>>>>>>>>> --2012-11-10 03:11:46-- > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > http://be.mirror.eurid.eu/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso > >>>>>>>>>>>> Resolving be.mirror.eurid.eu (be.mirror.eurid.eu)... failed: > >>>>>>>>> Temporary > >>>>>>>>>>>> failure in name resolution. > >>>>>>>>>>>> wget: unable to resolve host address `be.mirror.eurid.eu' > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Edison Su < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The latest devcloud vm using host-only-network(if you follow > >>> the > >>>>>>>>> steps > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-devcloud-environment-setup.html > >>>>>>>>>>>> ), > >>>>>>>>>>>>> which means, devcloud vm can't not access public network, > >>> thus, > >>>>>>>>>>> download > >>>>>>>>>>>>> template/iso doesn't work. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To fix the issue: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. You can use "Bridged networking", plug devcloud vm into > the > >>>>>>>>> network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> used by your laptop. Need to change devcloud vm's ip to the > ip > >>>>>>>>> address > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> your subnet. And also need to change > >>> tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Add a new network adaptor to devcloud vm, which is plugged > >>>> into > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bridged networking". So devcloud vm will have two nics, one > >>> is > >>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "host-only network", another one is on "bridge networking", > >>> which > >>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>>>> access public network. Then add default route on the bridge > >>>> network > >>>>>>>>>>> nic. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:34 PM > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Last tests with DevCloud VM ( > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-devcloud-environment-setup.html > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not succeed on my Linux machine. Management server works > >>>> fine > >>>>>>>>> like > >>>>>>>>>>>>> also creation of tiny instances but there are issues with NFS > >>>>>> mount, > >>>>>>>>>>> DNS > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and of course to download new ISO file (CentOs, ...). That > >>> was > >>>> not > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> case a few days ago > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> NFS & Primary/Secondary storage > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] > >>> (secstorage-1:) > >>>>>>>>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[204|Guest|6] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) > >>>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[204|Guest|6] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) > >>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[202|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) > >>>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[202|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) > >>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[201|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) > >>>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[201|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) > >>> Network > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[203|Storage|4] is not associated with any VPC WARN > >>>>>>>>>>> [utils.nio.Link] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (AgentManager-Selector:) SSL: Fail to find the generated > >>>> keystore. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Loading > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fail-safe one to continue. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN [storage.download.DownloadListener] (Timer-4:) Entering > >>>>>>>>> download > >>>>>>>>>>>>> error state: timeout waiting for response from storage host, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> template=centos.iso at host nfs://192.168.56.2: > >>>>>>>>> /opt/storage/secondary > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DNS > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# wget > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > http://ftp.belnet.be/packages/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --2012-11-04 23:17:41-- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > http://ftp.belnet.be/packages/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolving ftp.belnet.be (ftp.belnet.be)... failed: Temporary > >>>>>> failure > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> name resolution. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wget: unable to resolve host address `ftp.belnet.be' > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Question : Is Devcloud VM image ( > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova) > >>> still > >>>>>> up > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> date to work with Cloudstack 4.10-SNAPSHOT ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter > : > >>>>>>>>>>>> @cmoulliard > >>>>>>>>>>>>> | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Charles Moulliard > >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Charles Moulliard > >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Charles Moulliard > >> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Charles Moulliard > > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
