Yes, I'm using the almost same configuration and the reboot issue is bugging me as well. I'm stuck too. Will keep everyone posted if I find any solution.
Regards. On 16-Nov-2012, at 6:33 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sebastien, Rohit, > > I don't know yet what to do but I have found a workaround. > > Interfaces configuration > > more /etc/network/interfaces > # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system > # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). > > # The loopback network interface > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > # The Xen br0 inrerface > auto xenbr0 > iface xenbr0 inet dhcp > bridge_ports eth0 > > dns-nameserver 8.8.8.8 > dns-search 8.8.8.8 > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.56.2 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > broadcast 192.168.56.255 > gateway 192.168.56.1 > > > With the following config and after rebooting in VirtualBox the Ubuntu Xen > server, I cannot execute a ping www.google.com > > Here is what ifconfig returns > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:a5:d3:45 > inet addr:10.0.2.15 Bcast:10.0.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fea5:d345/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:2360 (2.3 KB) TX bytes:2834 (2.8 KB) > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:25:70:4b > inet addr:192.168.56.2 Bcast:192.168.56.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe25:704b/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:346 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:247 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:33815 (33.8 KB) TX bytes:30270 (30.2 KB) > > xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:a5:d3:45 > inet addr:10.0.2.15 Bcast:10.0.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fea5:d345/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:1152 (1.1 KB) TX bytes:1606 (1.6 KB) > > BUT now If I execute the this command "sudo /etc/init.d/networking > restart", then I'm able to do a ping www.google.be. > > If we look to what ifconfig returns, then we can see that eth0 has no IP > address attached while XenBr0 has it. > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:a5:d3:45 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:7823 (7.8 KB) TX bytes:7602 (7.6 KB) > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:25:70:4b > inet addr:192.168.56.2 Bcast:192.168.56.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe25:704b/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:702 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:509 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:64107 (64.1 KB) TX bytes:68565 (68.5 KB) > > xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:a5:d3:45 > inet addr:10.0.2.15 Bcast:10.0.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fea5:d345/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:29 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:39 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:3380 (3.3 KB) TX bytes:3527 (3.5 KB) > > Regards, > > Charles > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Will have a look on that to find a workaround : >> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Network_Configuration_Examples_(Xen_4.1%2B) >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Here is the config that I use >>> >>> - eth0 = NAT adapter >>> - eth1 = Host-In Adapter = Network 192.168.56.x >>> >>> I have experienced the same issue as you. After reboot I was not able >>> anymore to access internet. This is why I have put in comment the xenbr0 >>> configuration in /etc/network.interfaces >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >>> <run...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 16, 2012, at 8:10 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rohit, >>>>> >>>>> Can you answer to this question please ? Do I have to follow >>>> instructions >>>>> here to configure NFS server ( >>>>> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#nfs-shares-on-management-server >>>> ) >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Another thing that I would like to share. If we configure the Xenbr0 >>>>> interface like this, then the machine is not able to connect to >>>> internet >>>>> >>>>> more /etc/network/interfaces >>>>> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system >>>>> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). >>>>> >>>>> # The loopback network interface >>>>> auto lo >>>>> iface lo inet loopback >>>>> >>>>> # The primary network interface >>>>> auto eth0 >>>>> iface eth0 inet dhcp >>>>> >>>>> auto xenbr0 >>>>> iface xenbr0 inet dhcp >>>>> bridge_ports eth0 >>>>> >>>>> auto eth1 >>>>> iface eth1 inet static >>>>> address 192.168.56.2 >>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>>> broadcast 192.168.56.255 >>>>> gateway 192.168.56.1 >>>>> >>>>> Any idea is welcome ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Charles, I presume that eth0 is attached to a bridge adapter in vbox and >>>> that eth1 is attached to a host-only adapter in vbox ? >>>> >>>> I am having issues getting those two adapters to work simultaneously as >>>> well. It seems to work the first time you set it up but not after your >>>> reboot the machine. I tried with deleting >>>> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rule to no avail. I believe it's a >>>> vbox/OSX issue. >>>> >>>> -Sebastien >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Charles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My question was more about --> Do I have to follow instructions here >>>> to >>>>>> configure NFS server ( >>>>>> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#nfs-shares-on-management-server >>>> ) >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@citrix.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, hack and go through the .bash_history, setup systemvm template. >>>> Then >>>>>>> you're pretty much done as long as yout network won't fail you. >>>>>>> Rest, you have already built and run mgmt server. Won't be much help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com] >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:00 PM >>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rohit, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I progress. I have been able to install xen, configure network to >>>> create a >>>>>>> private network and also access to internet and nfs server is >>>>>>> installed (apt-get >>>>>>> install nfs-kernel-server). Do we have something more to do for NFS ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@citrix.com >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 15-Nov-2012, at 7:12 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As of ubuntu-11 is configured use xen, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "As of Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric), the default kernel included in >>>> Ubuntu >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> used directly with the Xen hypervisor as the management (or >>>> control) >>>>>>>> domain >>>>>>>>> (Dom0 or Domain0 in Xen terminology). " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why don't you create an image using it ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, I'm using this only. apt-get install xen-hypervisor and you're >>>>>>> done. >>>>>>>> To use xen, one just need to select the kernel with xen during >>>> booting >>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> grub. >>>>>>>> If you're keep, hack ~/.bash_history from the DevCloud image, the >>>>>>> history >>>>>>>> will tell you what was performed to create devcloud. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> About pre-seeding systemvm template, see this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You need to pre-seed, i.e. put a systemvm template on nfs with which >>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> systemvm, cpvm and domr are created. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Rohit Yadav < >>>> rohit.ya...@citrix.com >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 15-Nov-2012, at 2:10 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Using VirtualBox R4.2.4 on MacOS 10.7.5 and the image ( >>>>>>>>>>> http://bhaisaab.org/vms/ubuntu-12.04-x86-minimal-vm.tar.gz) that >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> provide, the OS does not boot (screen stays black). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh :( >>>>>>>>>> Will start with a new image today again. Will keep you posted. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Charles Moulliard < >>>>>>> ch0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks. What do you mean by "*Preseed a systemvm template >>>> and >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> should be good to go. (2. is the tricky one)" ?* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, this one: >>>>>>>>>> 2. Configure network such that it's accessible to the host os and >>>> can >>>>>>>>>> access Internet, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *I have started to create a google document to define >>>> step-by-step >>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>> do do.* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cool. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Rohit Yadav < >>>>>>> rohit.ya...@citrix.com >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14-Nov-2012, at 3:23 PM, Charles Moulliard < >>>> ch0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you been able to finalize your work about creating a new >>>>>>> Ubuntu >>>>>>>>>>>>> image >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for VirtualBox. If this is not the case, can you share with us >>>>>>>>>>>>> (document, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...) what you have done to configure Ubunttu (Installating >>>> MySQL, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomcat, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ....) ? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alright I'm back online, will work on releasing a devcloud >>>> image >>>>>>>> that I >>>>>>>>>>>>> hope would work out of the box, after some code monkey duties >>>> this >>>>>>>>>> week. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new image, mysql, tomcat, git etc. won't be installed on >>>>>>>> devcloud. >>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea is that you develop on your host os, debug with your fav. >>>> IDE >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>> mgmt server, mysql, jetty/tomcat as well (if you want to do >>>> that >>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> devcloud that too you can do). The default image will have only >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> preconfigured network, xen (kvm won't run as pv hypervisor, I >>>>>>> knew it >>>>>>>>>>>>> required hvm/intel-vt or amd-v, and I still tried just to see >>>> what >>>>>>>>>> happens >>>>>>>>>>>>> and it did not run) and nfs server. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already shared the base os, which is x86 ubuntu precise >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bhaisaab.org/vms/ubuntu-12.04-x86-minimal-vm.tar.gz(note: >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not devcloud, just the base system which is stripped down >>>> and >>>>>>>>>> archived, >>>>>>>>>>>>> ~250MB) Till I do that, you may try to diy devcloud, the top >>>> level >>>>>>>>>> goals >>>>>>>>>>>>> are to: 1. Install xen, 2. Configure network such that it's >>>>>>>> accessible >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> the host os and can access Internet, 3. Install and configure >>>>>>> NFS, 4. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Preseed a systemvm template and you should be good to go. (2. >>>> is >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> tricky >>>>>>>>>>>>> one) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just skip the following, something frivolous but for fun: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Around devcloud, I'm experimenting a lot (slow internet, plus >>>>>>> every >>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>> I mess I start from a fresh copy) so not able to produce a >>>> final >>>>>>>>>> image; you >>>>>>>>>>>>> may call me crazy for what I'm going to share next: so I've a >>>>>>>>>> raspberrypi >>>>>>>>>>>>> with me (a dirt cheap small single board arm 32bit computer, 4 >>>> GB >>>>>>>>>> sdcard, >>>>>>>>>>>>> 512MB ram etc., http://www.raspberrypi.org and we know >>>> devcloud >>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud in a box, I'm trying to see if I can create a devpi or >>>>>>>> basically >>>>>>>>>>>>> devcloud but in hardware and not as a vm, basically cloud in >>>> your >>>>>>>>>> pocket. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> installed debian wheezy on it and xen pv for arm (xen >>>> cloudplaform >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> arm, >>>>>>>>>>>>> this just blows up, even after cpvm disabled, ssvm etc. would >>>> just >>>>>>>>>> blow it >>>>>>>>>>>>> up), and this thing fails at the point when I restart it, also >>>> the >>>>>>>>>> default >>>>>>>>>>>>> sd card (it's storage, think hdd) is small (4GB) and the disk >>>> io >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>> small re-flashing it every time consumes a lot of my time, >>>>>>> ordered a >>>>>>>>>> 16GB >>>>>>>>>>>>> class10 sd card for better disk io, will keep you posted how >>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment went, I've a gut feeling though this won't work >>>> given >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> resource constraints. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Rohit Yadav < >>>>>>>> rohit.ya...@citrix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not really, in my setup I want eth0 to be host-only which is >>>>>>>> causing >>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues; another problem is I'm making it x86 only, so I see >>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>> crashes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will update when I'm done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 9:06 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you succeed it to fix the routing issues ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rohit Yadav < >>>>>>>> rohit.ya...@citrix.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, it won't work as the vms inside host only >>>> network >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access the host os and other vms on it. Therefore devcloud >>>>>>> inside >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host-only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network won't be able to reach the Internet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm actually trying to create a new devcloud image with two >>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adapters, one NAT (eth1, so devcloud is able to reach the >>>>>>>> Internet) >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host-only adapter (eth0, so we can run mgmt server etc.) >>>> and it >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only 300-350MB (archived). I was trying not the share the >>>>>>> image, >>>>>>>>>>>>> having >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some routing issues when I do that, will share as soon I fix >>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rohit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS. the base system is ubuntu x86 precise and the untouched >>>>>>>> stripped >>>>>>>>>>>>> down >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vm is available here: http://bhaisaab.org/vms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 4:46 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been able to setup the bridged adapter on virtualbox >>>> to >>>>>>>> allow >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guest machine to get an IP address (from my DHCP server >>>>>>> runinng in >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : 192.168.1x). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The guest is configured like this : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# more >>>>>>>> /etc/network/interfaces >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # The loopback network interface >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto lo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iface lo inet loopback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # The primary network interface >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto xenbr0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iface xenbr0 inet static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gateway 192.168.56.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address 192.168.56.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge_ports eth0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto eth0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iface eth0 inet static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auto eth1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iface eth1 inet dhcp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *********************************** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:df:00:00 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inet addr:192.168.1.6 Bcast:192.168.1.255 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fedf:0/64 Scope:Link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:7e:74:9c >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inet addr:192.168.56.2 Bcast:192.168.56.255 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe7e:749c/64 Scope:Link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ************************************* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ip route >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> default via 192.168.56.1 dev xenbr0 metric 100 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src >>>>>>>> 192.168.1.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.56.0/24 dev xenbr0 proto kernel scope link src >>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.56.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ************************************** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, DNS resolution still does not work. Is there >>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# wget >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://be.mirror.eurid.eu/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --2012-11-10 03:11:46-- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://be.mirror.eurid.eu/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolving be.mirror.eurid.eu (be.mirror.eurid.eu)... >>>> failed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Temporary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure in name resolution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wget: unable to resolve host address `be.mirror.eurid.eu' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Edison Su < >>>>>>> edison...@citrix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The latest devcloud vm using host-only-network(if you >>>> follow >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> steps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-devcloud-environment-setup.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which means, devcloud vm can't not access public network, >>>>>>> thus, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> template/iso doesn't work. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To fix the issue: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. You can use "Bridged networking", plug devcloud vm into >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used by your laptop. Need to change devcloud vm's ip to >>>> the ip >>>>>>>>>>>>> address >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your subnet. And also need to change >>>>>>> tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Add a new network adaptor to devcloud vm, which is >>>> plugged >>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bridged networking". So devcloud vm will have two nics, >>>> one >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "host-only network", another one is on "bridge networking", >>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access public network. Then add default route on the bridge >>>>>>>> network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:34 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last tests with DevCloud VM ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-devcloud-environment-setup.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not succeed on my Linux machine. Management server >>>> works >>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also creation of tiny instances but there are issues with >>>> NFS >>>>>>>>>> mount, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DNS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and of course to download new ISO file (CentOs, ...). That >>>>>>> was >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case a few days ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NFS & Primary/Secondary storage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] >>>>>>> (secstorage-1:) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[204|Guest|6] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) >>>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[204|Guest|6] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) >>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[202|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) >>>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[202|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) >>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[201|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) >>>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[201|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) >>>>>>> Network >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ntwk[203|Storage|4] is not associated with any VPC WARN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [utils.nio.Link] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (AgentManager-Selector:) SSL: Fail to find the generated >>>>>>>> keystore. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail-safe one to continue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN [storage.download.DownloadListener] (Timer-4:) >>>> Entering >>>>>>>>>>>>> download >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error state: timeout waiting for response from storage >>>> host, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> template=centos.iso at host nfs://192.168.56.2: >>>>>>>>>>>>> /opt/storage/secondary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DNS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root@devcloud:/home/devcloud/download# wget >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://ftp.belnet.be/packages/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --2012-11-04 23:17:41-- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://ftp.belnet.be/packages/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolving ftp.belnet.be (ftp.belnet.be)... failed: >>>> Temporary >>>>>>>>>> failure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name resolution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wget: unable to resolve host address `ftp.belnet.be' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question : Is Devcloud VM image ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova) >>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> up >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date to work with Cloudstack 4.10-SNAPSHOT ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>> Twitter : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @cmoulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
