----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/#review14022 -----------------------------------------------------------
Looks better now, please add Prasanna (tsp) and myself on the people/reviewer field. @Prasanna: can you do a review on this, before we commit it? - Rohit Yadav On Dec. 4, 2012, 11:50 a.m., Radoslaw Smigielski wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 11:50 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Description > ------- > > The main purpose behind cs-bugtool is to make easier collecting > logs required for CloudStack/CloudPlatform troubleshooting > and it mainly comes from Support. cs-bugtool collects logs, system > information and cloud database dump, compress everything and creates > .zip archive file ready to share with others. > For those familiar with Xen/XenServer cs-bugtool name may sound similar > to xen-bugtool, this similarity is intentional. > > Current version of cs-bugtool collects: > - basic system and environment information > - CP/CS management service logs > - basic system logs > - cloud database > > Current version does not accept any arguments but this may > changed in next iterations of cs-bugtool. > > We DO NOT collect and do not want to collect any sensitive information. > If there is still any sensitive pice of information please let us know > and we will try to remove it or replace by meaningless data. > > > Diffs > ----- > > tools/support/README PRE-CREATION > tools/support/cs-bugtool PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > I tested this on CS 3.0.4 and 3.0.5. > > > Thanks, > > Radoslaw Smigielski > >
