On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Ram Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 04 January 2013 00:13 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements >> >> I think that Ram and Hari are talking about CloudStack system "events" >> (call this set 1). The log4j conversation is around log messages being >> sent through the logger (call this set 2). >> >> If we assume that (2) is a superset of (1), then IMO there is no >> reason to do something different from the log4j syslog appender. On >> the other hand, if there is a portion of set (1) that is not included >> in set (2), then I actually think we have a logging problem to fix. > > Sorry for getting back late on this. The intent of this enhancement is to > send out system events in multiple(configured) formats. SNMP and Syslogs are > two formats. Users can choose the format of their interest based on their > existing element management infrastructure. Currently in CloudStack I guess > not all system events are logged into the log file. > >
As verbose as our logs are, there are still things missing from them?? :) --David
