Discussion limited to cloudstack-dev@ list. On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <[email protected]> wrote: > This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today. This > feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and > processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public forms such > as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed getting filed. Can > we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1. I understand we are few > days past cutoff, I will ensure we are more diligent in future. >
So if it's done, it needs to come through the IP clearance process. Step 1 is for the source code to be posted somewhere publicly for us to review. Following that, we should initiate a VOTE for 72 hours on our dev list for including the proposed donation. After that, someone needs to find an officer or ASF member that is willing to sponsor the process of working it through the incubator's IP clearance process. I'd also ask for the design to be included in the FS wiki page. I assume this isn't a problem, since the code is complete. This will allow us to have complete design docs for the release's features. As for the feature itself, is this another XenServer only feature proposal? We had discussed XenServer only issues during the Host Update Notification feature discussion, and (along with other concerns) we had agreed that features should be built to at least lay the groundwork for support beyond just one hypervisor. > Animesh >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:46 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology >> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Hari Kannan <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hello All, >> > >> > I wish to propose Support for Intel TXT for Cloud Use cases - I have >> > added some details here >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Int >> > el+TXT+Technology >> > >> > along with a JIRA ticket >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-939 >> > >> > Please review and comment >> > >> > Hari Kannan >> >> I've commented on the ticket. This has come in after our agreed proposal >> deadline, so I've changed the targeted version to Future. >> >> --David >
