On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hari Kannan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I will let Animesh comment on the IP/repo stuff - regarding the other 2 > topics you raised > > - I wouldn't claim code at a "done" level yet - we did develop code to a > sufficient level to demo, but it would need some more work for sure. It > hadn't made it as part of any Citrix commercial product either - it was > developed, showcased but hasn't yet seen the light of the day
Understood... so perhaps there isn't a design document. Perhaps the author of the code (not sure who it is) wouldn't mind adding some basic design elements to the FS wiki page. That will help the community evaluate the inclusion of the donated code. > - Regarding the XS part, it has been developed/tested only for XS - however, > the feature is not restricted for XS - in other words, unlike the host > updates, which was meant to be for XS only, this feature eventually must > support all hypervisors (or even baremetal servers) - at this time, it has > been developed for XS only.. > Excellent. I'd like to see that reflected in the design / code as well, but glad to hear it was a consideration! > Hari > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today. This >>> feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and >>> processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public forms >>> such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed getting >>> filed. Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1. I >>> understand we are few days past cutoff, I will ensure we are more diligent >>> in future. >>> >>> Animesh >> >> >> Is the code already in the repo? Or was it developed externally? >> > > Good question. My previous email made the assumption that it was not > currently in the project repo, but I could certainly be mistaken. > > -chip >
