The patch was add as a file attachment.

Is that the correct procedure?

DL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> Donal Lafferty
> Sent: 28 January 2013 21:56
> To: Chip Childers; Alex Huang
> Cc: cloudstack; Donal Lafferty
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Hyper-V 2012 Plugin Phase 1
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9126/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 28, 2013, 9:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers and Alex Huang.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> First cut of HyperV plugin, cloud-api changes to support VHDX image type,
> and test changes to deal with Windows clock accuracy and URI semantics.
> Large size due to inclusion of a disk image used for some of the unit testing.
> Not all unit test dependencies in place.  I'd rather download image files from
> a source than add them to the repo, but haven't found a link for this yet.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-999.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9126/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Donal Lafferty

Reply via email to