I don't see " failing to get physical interface from bridge" in agent.log.

I am pasting the first few lines from the agent.log before attempt was made to 
start the system vms:

2013-01-28 22:04:37,354 INFO  [utils.component.ComponentLocator] (main:null) 
Unable to find components.xml
2013-01-28 22:04:37,356 INFO  [utils.component.ComponentLocator] (main:null) 
Skipping configuration using components.xml
2013-01-28 22:04:37,356 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
Implementation Version is 4.1.0.20130128045141
2013-01-28 22:04:37,356 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
agent.properties found at /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties
2013-01-28 22:04:37,358 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting 
to using properties file for storage
2013-01-28 22:04:37,360 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting 
to the constant time backoff algorithm
2013-01-28 22:04:37,430 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) id is
2013-01-28 22:04:37,445 ERROR [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase] (main:null) 
Nics are not configured!
2013-01-28 22:04:37,450 INFO  [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase] (main:null) 
Designating private to be nic cloudbr0
2013-01-28 22:04:37,547 INFO  [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] 
(main:null) VirtualRoutingResource _scriptDir to use: scripts/network/domr/kvm
2013-01-28 22:04:38,482 INFO  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
(main:null) No libvirt.vif.driver specififed. Defaults to BridgeVifDriver.
2013-01-28 22:04:38,545 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) Agent [id = new : 
type = LibvirtComputingResource : zone = 1 : pod = 1 : workers = 5 : host = 
10.223.57.2 : port = 8250
2013-01-28 22:04:38,558 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) 
Connecting to 10.223.57.2:8250
2013-01-28 22:04:38,796 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) SSL: 
Handshake done
2013-01-28 22:04:39,239 INFO  [cloud.serializer.GsonHelper] 
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Default Builder inited.
2013-01-28 22:04:39,294 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) 
Proccess agent startup answer, agent id = 0
2013-01-28 22:04:39,294 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) Set 
agent id 0
2013-01-28 22:04:39,300 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) 
Startup Response Received: agent id = 0
2013-01-28 22:04:39,570 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) 
Proccess agent ready command, agent id = 1
2013-01-28 22:04:39,570 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) 
Set agent id 1
2013-01-28 22:04:39,571 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) 
Ready command is processed: agent id = 1
2013-01-28 22:04:39,667 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) 
Proccess agent ready command, agent id = 1
2013-01-28 22:04:39,667 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) 
Set agent id 1
2013-01-28 22:04:39,667 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) 
Ready command is processed: agent id = 1
2013-01-28 22:07:08,861 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Exception
com.cloud.exception.InternalErrorException: Failed to create vnet 1363: Set 
name-type for VLAN subsystem. Should be visible in /proc/net/vlan/configERROR: 
trying to add VLAN #1363 to IF -:br-1363:-  error: No such deviceFailed to 
create vlan 1363 on pif: br-1363.
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver.createVnet(BridgeVifDriver.java:170)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver.createVlanBr(BridgeVifDriver.java:156)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver.plug(BridgeVifDriver.java:119)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.createVif(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3301)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.createVifs(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3069)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3093)
        at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1174)
        at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
        at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
        at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)

-Thanks
Sangeetha

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 4:09 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

Looking at the ipv6 branch... do you see a "failing to get physical interface 
from bridge" in your agent log?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What sort of system is this? I'm just wondering when to expect 'em'
> type devices. This is going to get ugly if we can't anticipate a 
> reasonable naming convention for physical nics.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan 
> <sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> em1

Reply via email to