This is because if there is no private.network.device config in your
/etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties file, LibvirtComputingResource.java
defaults to 'cloudbr1'.  I would suggest setting all of your traffic
labels to cloudbr0, or setting private.network.device to cloubr0.  I'm
assuming it was set up this way because of the recommendation that
management and public be on different physical networks, but I can't
really say for sure what the intention was. I think the default
agent.properties file has it defined as cloudbr1 as well.

I suppose this is broken since the default in the ui says 'use default
gateway', which it's not doing, but I don't think it's a regression or
new bug, I think it's been that way since I started using cloudstack.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan
<sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> I tried with the patch you have provided on IPV6 branch.
>
> Now I see the the public interface being programed correctly. But there are 
> issues with 'cloudbr1' and system Vms are still not coming up.
> The same issue is also seen when testing with master branch.
>
>
> [root@Rack3Host4 agent]# brctl show
> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> brem1-1363              8000.bc305bd41f86       no              em1.1363
> cloud0          8000.000000000000       no
> cloudbr0                8000.bc305bd41f86       no              em1
> virbr0          8000.525400463d1f       yes             virbr0-nic
>
>
> [root@Rack3Host4 agent]# ls  /sys/devices/virtual/net
> brem1-1363  cloud0  cloudbr0  em1.1363  lo  virbr0  virbr0-nic
>
> Following exception seen in agent.log:
>
> 2013-01-29 18:40:55,451 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Failed to start domain: v-2-VM: Cannot get 
> interface MTU on 'cloudbr1': No such device
> 2013-01-29 18:40:55,452 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Exception
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: Cannot get interface MTU on 'cloudbr1': No such 
> device
>         at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>         at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>         at org.libvirt.Domain.processError(Unknown Source)
>         at org.libvirt.Domain.create(Unknown Source)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startDomain(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1049)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3096)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1174)
>         at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
>         at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
>         at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> 2013-01-29 18:40:55,452 WARN  [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Caught:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.cleanupVMNetworks(LibvirtComputingResource.java:4223)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.handleVmStartFailure(LibvirtComputingResource.java:2992)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3116)
>         at 
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1174)
>         at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
>         at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
>         at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>
> Thanks
> Sangeetha
>
>

Reply via email to