Cloudstack creates guest bridges for vlan isolation as needed, but does not create your public/private bridges, as the docs state it's up to the admin to make sure those are in place.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan <sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Marcus, > > In my case , I did not do any changes to the existing bridges after a fresh > install of Rhel 6.3 and assumed that cloud stack will create the required > bridges. > Is this assumption valid ? If this is not the case then we will make sure > that 'cloudbr0' and 'cloudbr1' bridges get created before adding the hosts to > cloudstack. > > > Thanks > Sangeetha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:29 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host > > Is this a non-issue? In reviewing the cloudstack 4.0 installation docs, > section 8.1.7: > > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html > > "In order to forward traffic to your instances you will need at least two > bridges: public and private. > By default these bridges are called cloudbr0 and cloudbr1, but you do have to > make sure they are available on each hypervisor. The most important factor is > that you keep the configuration consistent on all your hypervisors." > > and > > "The goal is to have two bridges called 'cloudbr0' and 'cloudbr1' > after this section. This should be used as a guideline only. The exact > configuration will depend on your network layout." > > So anyone following the docs would be expected to have a cloudbr1 and > everything would work. It seems that maybe you've set up an environment where > you have configured everything to use cloudbr0, which is fine for a custom > setup, and then upgraded to master and wiped out the custom settings? > >
