On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> I stated my opinion on this previously [1], but for the record again: >> >> I would suggest that we only do bug-fix releases for: >> >> - The latest feature release of our active major version number (i.e.: >> 4.x) To make sure I get this right: So Once we release 4.2 we will only bug fix 4.1 and stop bug fixing 4.0 ? >> - The latest feature release of our last major version number (doesn't >> exist today, but will be 4.x when / if we bump to 5.0) Once we jump to 5.X we will bug fix the latest 4.x release (if it's 4.2, we will stop bug fixing 4.1) ? The really crucial part for me is to make sure we have a really solid/tested upgrade path. We cannot leave anyone out in the cold of a "unsupported" release. >> >> Just my opinion though. Others? >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/quzgjne44prl5m2c > > Given the current levels of participation on dot-releases, I think this > is the most realistic approach that's good for the community. > > +1 > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
