The LVM volumes are not files, so no you can't save them like that. They can be converted to VHD files though, which is what CloudStack does when you take a snapshot of a volume. CloudStack converts the LVM to a VHD file and places it on secondary storage.
For your VLAN question. You can put both VLANs on the same interface if you want, but I recommend that you keep management and storage traffic on separate NICs for performance reasons. -----Original Message----- From: claude bariot [mailto:clobar...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:06 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CLoudStack and OpenFiler2.99 If I need to backup VMs root disks, I same can save this files ? I've another question concerning VLAN : I project to create 2 vlans : vlan1 for admin trafics between Management serv, hosts and storage node. And vlan2 for VMs trafics (Application Vlan). My question is : It's necessary to attribute 1 host NIC (eth0) for vlan1 and the second host NIC (eth1) for vlan2 ? I hope that I'll have a response quiqly. regard On 19 September 2012 18:16, Clayton Weise <cwe...@iswest.net> wrote: > Right, those are LVM volumes that have been created by XenServer and > assigned to virtual machines. If you want to see what VMs they're attached > to you can run various 'xe' commands to see. For example, 'xe vm-list' > will give you a list of all of your VMs. If you know the UUID of the VM > already then you can run 'xe vm-disk-list uuid=(uuid)' where (uuid) is the > UUID of the VM in question. > > -----Original Message----- > From: claude bariot [mailto:clobar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:04 AM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CLoudStack and OpenFiler2.99 > > ok > look below, what I see from the Management server : > > root@cloud-cms1:/export/primary# *ls -l > /dev/VG_XenStorage-d870c716-4c81-1a64-4d90-5a91f835f422/* > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 240 2012-09-13 16:56 ./ > drwxr-xr-x. 18 root root 3620 2012-09-17 15:40 ../ > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 110 2012-09-13 16:56 > hb-5010b2b2-8cb4-447d-aae1-2453571df587 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-hb--5010b2b2--8cb4--447d--aae1--2453571df587 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 110 2012-09-13 16:56 > hb-c1a30f79-7327-4f16-b450-defa14442433 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-hb--c1a30f79--7327--4f16--b450--defa14442433 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 69 2012-09-13 16:56 MGT -> > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-MGT > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-35e13f3a-e126-4e7a-bb7d-1e1732f59e84 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--35e13f3a--e126--4e7a--bb7d--1e1732f59e84 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-38afc9cc-366e-44bd-95a9-21fd2f194785 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--38afc9cc--366e--44bd--95a9--21fd2f194785 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-51b1d1f7-767f-4268-ab07-696932dddc96 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--51b1d1f7--767f--4268--ab07--696932dddc96 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-5c717365-bbab-4781-a1ea-4651db5efca6 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--5c717365--bbab--4781--a1ea--4651db5efca6 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-b849c29a-e7aa-4d77-b965-7845e8be079b -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--b849c29a--e7aa--4d77--b965--7845e8be079b > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-c23673fb-3e40-4b0f-9cee-e2c947bdda59 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--c23673fb--3e40--4b0f--9cee--e2c947bdda59 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 111 2012-09-13 16:56 > VHD-d2358d95-b4e8-4426-9c68-33686251a2b3 -> > > ../mapper/VG_XenStorage--d870c716--4c81--1a64--4d90--5a91f835f422-VHD--d2358d95--b4e8--4426--9c68--33686251a2b3 > > > There are VMs roots volumes stored into the Primary storage ? > If it's true, what can I associate this files with VMs hostname or Instance > name ? > > Regards > > > On 18 September 2012 18:31, Jason Davis <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hence why you should consider NFS for management simplicity :) > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Clayton Weise <cwe...@iswest.net> > wrote: > > > > > If it's a LUN, it's a block device. You can't just look in "/" and > find > > > it. In the case of XenServer, it creates a CLVM device for the iSCSI > or > > FC > > > LUN and that logical volume is shared amongst all of the hosts in the > > > cluster. Then, for each virtual disk (VDI) you create XenServer > creates > > an > > > LVM "partition" (partition isn't actually the correct technical term, > but > > > it's the easiest way to express it) for that virtual disk. So > > essentially, > > > each virtual disk is another LVM partition. > > > > > > It's not a filesystem, it's not like NFS. You can't just browse into > it, > > > in the same way you can't just plug in a hard drive and browse into > that > > > either. You need a filesystem on top of the block device that you then > > > need to mount. > > > > > > If you're used to iSCSI or FC with VMware the reason you can browse > into > > a > > > block device is because VMware formats the device with a filesystem > > called > > > VMFS. In the case of XenServer, there is no file system, just block > > > devices that are handed to individual virtual machines. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: claude bariot [mailto:clobar...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:31 AM > > > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: CLoudStack and OpenFiler2.99 > > > > > > Thanks for this precision. > > > > > > Bat, How can I display datas (VMs Root DISKs) on the Lun ? > > > I'll need to do ls command into the storage server or not / > > > How can I find stored directory when I would like to display files ... > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > On 18 September 2012 16:14, Jason Davis <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Remember that if you will be presenting LUNs to your XenServer > Cluster, > > > > that the LUN is effectively shared between all hosts within the > > > cluster... > > > > ie: LUNs are not tied to a specific host per say. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:38 AM, claude bariot <clobar...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > We'll using XenServer as Hypervisor. > > > > > My boss prefere to create same Luns with OpenFiler, then each Lun > > will > > > be > > > > > attached to Xen Host. > > > > > > > > > > May be we can use it as a local primary storage. > > > > > > > > > > I know that, We can add PS via CS UI. > > > > > > > > > > On 18 September 2012 15:21, Jason Davis <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ah time to chime in :) > > > > > > > > > > > > I would recommend using NFS for primary and secondary storage... > > NFS > > > is > > > > > > *much* more straight forward. That and VM's provisioned via NFS > are > > > > > > inherently thin. With iSCSI this may or may not be true > (dependent > > on > > > > > what > > > > > > hypervisor is being used.) > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on what you are setting up, the theoretical speed > advantages > > of > > > > > iSCSI > > > > > > vs NFSv3 are moot. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:23 AM, claude bariot < > > clobar...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > One more question : > > > > > > > How can I find files (for Primary and Secondary Storage) When > > there > > > > are > > > > > > > using Iscsi device (Luns) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 September 2012 10:30, claude bariot <clobar...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I building a testbed plateform. > > > > > > > > Could you let me know, the pest precedures (best way) for > > > configure > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > I have 2 hosts (xenserver), 1 Mangement server (Ubuntu > 10.04) 1 > > > > > storage > > > > > > > > server with OpenFiler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I need the process please .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17 September 2012 23:51, Geoff Higginbottom < > > > > > > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Claude, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> We have frequently used OpenFiler on our test and proof of > > > concept > > > > > > (POC) > > > > > > > >> builds, however to be fair none of our clients have ever > used > > it > > > > in > > > > > a > > > > > > > >> production environment. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Geoff > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 17 Sep 2012, at 14:45, "claude bariot" < > > clobar...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Hello > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Someone has already used CloudStack with OpenFiler as > storage > > > > > > > management ? > > > > > > > >> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical > > consulting > > > > and > > > > > > > >> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and > > > > Enterprises > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >> build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue's expertise, > > combined > > > > > with > > > > > > > >> CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and > > > Enterprises > > > > > to > > > > > > > >> deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or > end-user. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ________________________________ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and > > are > > > > > > > intended > > > > > > > >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. > > > Any > > > > > > views > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > > > > > > necessarily > > > > > > > >> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the > intended > > > > > > > recipient of > > > > > > > >> this email, you must neither take any action based upon its > > > > > contents, > > > > > > > nor > > > > > > > >> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you > > > > believe > > > > > > you > > > > > > > >> have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a > company > > > > > > > incorporated > > > > > > > >> in England & Wales. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >