Hi,

I have the same here.
Additionally if I create a new account and want to deploy the first instance on 
the new account then it always fails with a MySQL duplicate entry exception.
The management server calls the "Adding DB entries" bit twice and the second 
throws an exception and rolls everything back.
I'd like to use 4.0 especially because of the console proxy can follow screen 
resolution changes, but it seems I cannot go for 4.0 just yet.
I've filed several Critical and Blocker issues for 4.0

Regards

Tamas Monos                                               DDI         
+44(0)2034687012
Chief Technical                                             Office    
+44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists               Fax         +44(0)871 522 7057
http://www.veber.co.uk

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Reed [mailto:jeffr...@jeffreed.net] 
Sent: 29 November 2012 17:55
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Zone 1 is not ready to launch console proxy yet

Hey folks,

I'm having a problem after upgrading from cloudstack 3.0.2 to 4.0.  I followed 
the instructions here:
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-3.0.2-to-4.0

I've upgraded the agent machines from CentOS 6.2 to CentOS 6.3 and all packages 
are current, and am running KVM as the hypervisor.  The management server isn't 
running as an agent.  There are two machines running as agents.  I have a 
mishmash of hardware, but all CPUs are AMD Phenoms.

I used the convenience packages from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.0 to 
do the upgrade.

I have everything running, except for the system vms.  Neither the console 
proxy nor the secondary storage VMs are running, or even seem to try to start.  
I can start VMs from my templates, and everything seems to work fine, but 
(obviously) the console proxy doesn't work, and machines that require secondary 
storage won't work (but I don't currently have any of those).

The related messages from the server:
2012-11-29 09:44:56,261 TRACE [db.Transaction.Connection] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Creating a DB connection with  no txn:  for 0: dbconn1086427264. Stack: 
-Transaction.prepareStatement:453-Transaction.prepareAutoCloseStatement:446-GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved:380-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34-GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved:342-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34-GenericDaoBase.listIncludingRemovedBy:894-GenericDaoBase.listBy:871-GenericDaoBase.listBy:884-DataCenterDaoImpl.listEnabledZones:366-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34-ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.getScannablePools:1915
2012-11-29 09:44:56,261 TRACE [db.Transaction.Statement] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Preparing: SELECT data_center.id, data_center.name, data_center.description, 
data_center.dns1, data_center.dns2, data_center.internal_dns1, 
data_center.internal_dns2, data_center.router_mac_address, 
data_center.guest_network_cidr, data_center.domain_id, data_center.domain, 
data_center.networktype, data_center.dns_provider, data_center.dhcp_provider, 
data_center.gateway_provider, data_center.vpn_provider, 
data_center.userdata_provider, data_center.lb_provider, 
data_center.firewall_provider, data_center.mac_address, data_center.zone_token, 
data_center.removed, data_center.allocation_state, data_center.uuid, 
data_center.is_security_group_enabled, data_center.is_local_storage_enabled 
FROM data_center WHERE data_center.allocation_state = ?  AND 
data_center.removed IS NULL
2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 TRACE [db.Transaction.Statement] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Closing: org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement@63f5e4b6
2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 TRACE [db.Transaction.Connection] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Closing DB connection: dbconn1086427264
2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 DEBUG [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(consoleproxy-1:null) Zone 1 is not ready to launch console proxy yet
2012-11-29 09:44:56,265 TRACE [utils.db.GlobalLock] (consoleproxy-1:null) lock 
consoleproxy.scan.lock is returned to free state, total holding time :32
2012-11-29 09:44:56,265 TRACE [utils.db.GlobalLock] (consoleproxy-1:null) lock 
consoleproxy.scan.lock is released, lock count :0
2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Select SQL: SELECT stack_maid.id, stack_maid.msid, stack_maid.thread_id, 
stack_maid.seq, stack_maid.cleanup_delegate, stack_maid.cleanup_context, 
stack_maid.created FROM stack_maid WHERE
2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Remove SQL: No remove sql
2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase] (consoleproxy-1:null) 
Select by Id SQL: SELECT stack_maid.id, stack_maid.msid, stack_maid.thread_id, 
stack_maid.seq, stack_maid.cleanup_delegate, stack_maid.cleanup_context, 
stack_maid.created FROM stack_maid WHERE stack_maid.id = ?


The systemVM was downloaded from 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 
when my cloud was originally set up (which incidentally is the same as given in 
the installation instructions for 4.0-incubator).

The system VM shows in the database as being DOWNLOADED:
            id: 3
       host_id: 2
   template_id: 3
       created: 2012-10-24 23:56:42
  last_updated: 2012-11-27 12:04:05
        job_id: NULL
  download_pct: 100
          size: 725811200
 physical_size: 725811200
download_state: DOWNLOADED
     error_str: NULL
    local_path: NULL
  install_path: template/tmpl/1/3//b5d17e02-394a-4a01-bf13-6963b3127c39.qcow2
           url: 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2
     destroyed: 0
       is_copy: 0


My 3.0.2 CS installation ran perfectly since I set it up, but I'd really like 
to get 4.0-incubator up and running correctly.

I've googled and tried pretty much everything I've found (which isn't much), 
but to no avail.  I can't find any reason that the management server thinks the 
zone isn't ready to launch the system VMs.  I've restarted the pod, the 
cluster, the hosts in the cluster, the zone, but I still have the issue.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jeff

Reply via email to