Can you check the value of secondary.storage.vm in the configuration table?
It should exist and its value should be 'true'.



On 12/4/12 4:45 AM, "Jeff Reed" <jeffr...@jeffreed.net> wrote:

>Thanks Chiradeep for your helpÅ  here are the results from both queries:
>
>mysql> SELECT data_center.id, data_center.name, data_center.description,
>data_center.dns1, data_center.dns2, data_center.internal_dns1,
>data_center.internal_dns2, data_center.router_mac_address,
>data_center.guest_network_cidr, data_center.domain_id,
>data_center.domain, data_center.networktype, data_center.dns_provider,
>data_center.dhcp_provider, data_center.gateway_provider,
>data_center.vpn_provider, data_center.userdata_provider,
>data_center.lb_provider, data_center.firewall_provider,
>data_center.mac_address, data_center.zone_token, data_center.removed,
>data_center.allocation_state, data_center.uuid,
>data_center.is_security_group_enabled,
>data_center.is_local_storage_enabled FROM data_center WHERE
>data_center.allocation_state = 'Enabled'  AND data_center.removed IS NULL
>\G
>*************************** 1. row ***************************
>                       id: 1
>                     name: zone
>              description: NULL
>                     dns1: 192.168.1.1
>                     dns2: NULL
>            internal_dns1: 192.168.1.1
>            internal_dns2: NULL
>       router_mac_address: 02:00:00:00:00:01
>       guest_network_cidr: NULL
>                domain_id: NULL
>                   domain: NULL
>              networktype: Basic
>             dns_provider: VirtualRouter
>            dhcp_provider: VirtualRouter
>         gateway_provider: NULL
>             vpn_provider: NULL
>        userdata_provider: VirtualRouter
>              lb_provider: ElasticLoadBalancerVm
>        firewall_provider: NULL
>              mac_address: 117
>               zone_token: b862f66d-e1de-3992-bb5c-7d8bb9811769
>                  removed: NULL
>         allocation_state: Enabled
>                     uuid: 55450c92-4fdc-4933-a777-fb9b9f6ab243
>is_security_group_enabled: 1
> is_local_storage_enabled: 0
>1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
>
>mysql> select * from (select h.data_center_id, h.type, count(*) as count
>from host as h INNER JOIN mshost as m ON h.mgmt_server_id=m.msid where
>h.status='Up' and h.type='SecondaryStorage' and m.last_update >
>'2012-12-04 12:39:26' group by h.data_center_id, h.type UNION ALL select
>h.data_center_id, h.type, count(*) as count from host as h INNER JOIN
>mshost as m ON h.mgmt_server_id=m.msid where h.status='Up' and
>h.type='Routing' and m.last_update > '2012-12-04 12:39:26' group by
>h.data_center_id, h.type) as t ORDER by t.data_center_id, t.type;
>+----------------+---------+-------+
>| data_center_id | type    | count |
>+----------------+---------+-------+
>|              1 | Routing |     2 |
>+----------------+---------+-------+
>1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
>
>On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> There's 3 minimum requirements to start a system vm:
>> 1. The zone is enabled
>> 2. There is primary storage ready that matches the type of the system vm
>> offering (e.g., if only local is available, then system vm disk offering
>> also needs to be local)
>> 3. The system vm templates are DOWNLOADED
>> 3. There are enough hosts in the 'UP' state
>> select * from (select h.data_center_id, h.type, count(*) as count from
>> host as h INNER JOIN mshost as m ON h.mgmt_server_id=m.msid
>> where h.status='Up' and h.type='SecondaryStorage' and m.last_update > ?
>> group by h.data_center_id, h.type UNION ALL select h.data_center_id,
>> h.type, count(*) as count from host as h INNER JOIN mshost as m ON
>> h.mgmt_server_id=m.msid where h.status='Up' and h.type='Routing' and
>> m.last_update > ? group by h.data_center_id, h.type) as t ORDER by
>> t.data_center_id, t.type;
>>
>> The '?' is to be replaced by a date equivalent to now() in GMT - 150
>>secs
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/3/12 6:58 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> So what is the result of the below SQL query if  you run it by hand?
>>> Use data_center.allocation_state = 'Enabled'
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/12 9:54 AM, "Jeff Reed" <jeffr...@jeffreed.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>
>>>> I'm having a problem after upgrading from cloudstack 3.0.2 to 4.0.  I
>>>> followed the instructions here:
>>>> 
>>>>http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0
>>>>.0
>>>> -
>>>> 
>>>>incubating/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-3.
>>>>0.
>>>> 2
>>>> -to-4.0
>>>>
>>>> I've upgraded the agent machines from CentOS 6.2 to CentOS 6.3 and all
>>>> packages are current, and am running KVM as the hypervisor.  The
>>>> management server isn't running as an agent.  There are two machines
>>>> running as agents.  I have a mishmash of hardware, but all CPUs are
>>>>AMD
>>>> Phenoms.
>>>>
>>>> I used the convenience packages from
>>>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.0 to do the upgrade.
>>>>
>>>> I have everything running, except for the system vms.  Neither the
>>>> console proxy nor the secondary storage VMs are running, or even seem
>>>>to
>>>> try to start.  I can start VMs from my templates, and everything
>>>>seems to
>>>> work fine, but (obviously) the console proxy doesn't work, and
>>>>machines
>>>> that require secondary storage won't work (but I don't currently have
>>>>any
>>>> of those).
>>>>
>>>> The related messages from the server:
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,261 TRACE [db.Transaction.Connection]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Creating a DB connection with  no txn:  for 0:
>>>> dbconn1086427264. Stack:
>>>> 
>>>>-Transaction.prepareStatement:453-Transaction.prepareAutoCloseStatement
>>>>:4
>>>> 4
>>>> 
>>>>6-GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved:380-DatabaseCallback.intercept:
>>>>34
>>>> -
>>>> 
>>>>GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved:342-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34
>>>>-G
>>>> e
>>>> 
>>>>nericDaoBase.listIncludingRemovedBy:894-GenericDaoBase.listBy:871-Gener
>>>>ic
>>>> D
>>>> 
>>>>aoBase.listBy:884-DataCenterDaoImpl.listEnabledZones:366-DatabaseCallba
>>>>ck
>>>> .
>>>> intercept:34-ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.getScannablePools:1915
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,261 TRACE [db.Transaction.Statement]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Preparing: SELECT data_center.id,
>>>>data_center.name,
>>>> data_center.description, data_center.dns1, data_center.dns2,
>>>> data_center.internal_dns1, data_center.internal_dns2,
>>>> data_center.router_mac_address, data_center.guest_network_cidr,
>>>> data_center.domain_id, data_center.domain, data_center.networktype,
>>>> data_center.dns_provider, data_center.dhcp_provider,
>>>> data_center.gateway_provider, data_center.vpn_provider,
>>>> data_center.userdata_provider, data_center.lb_provider,
>>>> data_center.firewall_provider, data_center.mac_address,
>>>> data_center.zone_token, data_center.removed,
>>>> data_center.allocation_state, data_center.uuid,
>>>> data_center.is_security_group_enabled,
>>>> data_center.is_local_storage_enabled FROM data_center WHERE
>>>> data_center.allocation_state = ?  AND data_center.removed IS NULL
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 TRACE [db.Transaction.Statement]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Closing:
>>>> org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement@63f5e4b6
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 TRACE [db.Transaction.Connection]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Closing DB connection: dbconn1086427264
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,264 DEBUG
>>>> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null)
>>>>Zone 1
>>>> is not ready to launch console proxy yet
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,265 TRACE [utils.db.GlobalLock]
>>>>(consoleproxy-1:null)
>>>> lock consoleproxy.scan.lock is returned to free state, total holding
>>>>time
>>>> :32
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,265 TRACE [utils.db.GlobalLock]
>>>>(consoleproxy-1:null)
>>>> lock consoleproxy.scan.lock is released, lock count :0
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Select SQL: SELECT stack_maid.id,
>>>>stack_maid.msid,
>>>> stack_maid.thread_id, stack_maid.seq, stack_maid.cleanup_delegate,
>>>> stack_maid.cleanup_context, stack_maid.created FROM stack_maid WHERE
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Remove SQL: No remove sql
>>>> 2012-11-29 09:44:56,267 TRACE [utils.db.GenericDaoBase]
>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Select by Id SQL: SELECT stack_maid.id,
>>>> stack_maid.msid, stack_maid.thread_id, stack_maid.seq,
>>>> stack_maid.cleanup_delegate, stack_maid.cleanup_context,
>>>> stack_maid.created FROM stack_maid WHERE stack_maid.id = ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The systemVM was downloaded from
>>>> 
>>>>http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2
>>>>.b
>>>> z
>>>> 2 when my cloud was originally set up (which incidentally is the same
>>>>as
>>>> given in the installation instructions for 4.0-incubator).
>>>>
>>>> The system VM shows in the database as being DOWNLOADED:
>>>>           id: 3
>>>>      host_id: 2
>>>>  template_id: 3
>>>>      created: 2012-10-24 23:56:42
>>>> last_updated: 2012-11-27 12:04:05
>>>>       job_id: NULL
>>>> download_pct: 100
>>>>         size: 725811200
>>>> physical_size: 725811200
>>>> download_state: DOWNLOADED
>>>>    error_str: NULL
>>>>   local_path: NULL
>>>> install_path:
>>>> template/tmpl/1/3//b5d17e02-394a-4a01-bf13-6963b3127c39.qcow2
>>>>          url:
>>>> 
>>>>http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2
>>>>.b
>>>> z
>>>> 2
>>>>    destroyed: 0
>>>>      is_copy: 0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My 3.0.2 CS installation ran perfectly since I set it up, but I'd
>>>>really
>>>> like to get 4.0-incubator up and running correctly.
>>>>
>>>> I've googled and tried pretty much everything I've found (which isn't
>>>> much), but to no avail.  I can't find any reason that the management
>>>> server thinks the zone isn't ready to launch the system VMs.  I've
>>>> restarted the pod, the cluster, the hosts in the cluster, the zone,
>>>>but I
>>>> still have the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to