Hello Andrew,

Thanks for the suggestion.  Andrei Savu (we work together) also
suggested I go with jclouds but I wanted to hear what the community
has to say about this. We're building an app that can reliably
provision 10's 100's of machines across cloud providers.
Right now it's actually a contest, winner gets a present from the
looser. I have to implement Cloudstack and he's got Amazon.

Good luck with your talk tomorrow, maybe you could share the
slides/presentation afterwords.

Thanks,

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I can toot my own horn (as the current de facto maintainer of the jclouds 
> CloudStack work), I'd strongly suggest using jclouds. It uses the real 
> CloudStack API rather than the AWS shim, and gives you all the bells and 
> whistles, retries, abstractions etc from jclouds. You can also use the 
> CloudStack API directly (I.e., not through the jclouds abstraction layer) if 
> you need access to CloudStack-specific functionality. I'm actually going to 
> be giving a talk about jclouds and CloudStack tomorrow here at the CloudStack 
> Collaboration Conference. =)
>
> A.
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Cloudstack,
>>
>> I've just joined the community. I'm working on a project (soon to be
>> proposed in the ASF Incubator) that aims to make the task of
>> provisioning VM's on cloud infrastructure very easy. I've just started
>> working on the Cloudstack driver and I need your help picking the
>> client API library. Which one should I pick? We are currently using
>> Cloudstack 3.0, but also thinking about the future.
>>
>> I know about:
>> - jclouds support for cloudstack
>> - cloudbridge Amazon API layer - so maybe Amazon SDK or jclouds again
>> - cloudstack API?
>>
>> Which one is more suitable for now and which one do you think will be
>> developed further in the future?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Ioan Eugen Stan / CTO / http://axemblr.com



-- 
Ioan Eugen Stan / CTO / http://axemblr.com

Reply via email to