That's right.

Inetbr0 with ip is reachable from outside.

Yep, mgmtbr0 = int. ip, guestbr0 = lacp bond without ip, inetbr0 without ip.

How I understand from the documentation and gгestbr0 inetbr0 not need IP.
 Am I right?



2012/12/15 Trevor Francis <tre...@46labs.com>

> Don't rule our your VLANS so quickly.
>
> When you add IP to bridge, you can ping from the outside world?
>
> So right now, you have mgmtbr0 = internal IP, guestbr0 = lacp bond (no
> ip), inetbr0  no ip?
>
>
>
>
> Trevor Francis
> Partner
> 46 Labs | PeerEdge Cloud Switch (PeCS)
> http://www.46labs.com | http://www.peeredge.net
> 720-214-3643- Voice
> tre...@46labs.com
>
> Solutions Provider for the Telecom Industry
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Aleksey Samarin <nrg3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Well, mgmtrb0 is eth0, guestbr0 = bond (802.3ad), inetbr0 = eth2.
>
> Problem definitely not in VLAN, because then i add ip to the bridge
> everything works.
>
>  Any thoughts?
>
> Alex.
>
>
>
> 2012/12/15 Trevor Francis <tre...@46labs.com>
>
>> Alesky,
>>
>> Are these bridges created over a single interface or bonded interface, or
>> are these spread across multiple bonded interfaces on multiple switches.
>>
>> As Anthony pointed out, VLANs are usually the culprit for "many a bridge
>> issue."
>>
>> Are you running a VLAN aware switch? If so, are the VLANs setup on the
>> switch for those switch ports? Are they setup from the host you are
>> attempting to ping from?
>>
>> Typically you may need to set the default VLAN on your Internet port on
>> your switch to the VLAN that your internet interface is attempting to use.
>>
>> Also, I would recommend tagging your VLANs.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Trevor Francis
>> Partner
>> 46 Labs | PeerEdge Cloud Switch (PeCS)
>>
>> http://www.46labs.com | http://www.peeredge.net
>> 720-214-3643- Voice
>> tre...@46labs.com
>>
>> Solutions Provider for the Telecom Industry
>>
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Aleksey Samarin <nrg3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thx for reply!
>>
>> Of course! Problem only with inetbr0, another bridges works fine.
>>
>> To be sure:
>>
>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>> 1
>>
>> cat /etc/sysctl.conf | grep ipv4.ip_forward
>> net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
>>
>> Yes, I had a problem with sistemvm.iso, but here only the network problem.
>>
>> Alex.
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/15 Trevor Francis <tre...@46labs.com>
>>
>>> Have you set the KVM traffic labels within Cloudstack when you spun up
>>> your zone?
>>>
>>> Do you have IPV4 forwarding on?
>>>
>>>
>>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>>
>>> If not, turn it on, and make it permanent by:
>>>
>>> sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
>>>
>>> /etc/sysctl.conf:
>>> net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
>>>
>>> I also had problems with system ISOs because the latest incubating for
>>> Ubuntu (this may have already been fixed) does not include the system VM
>>> ISOs when you do a apt-get install cloud-agent. If you did a source
>>> install, it may be different.
>>>
>>> Just my initial thoughts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Trevor Francis
>>> Partner
>>> 46 Labs
>>> http://www.46labs.com | http://www.peeredge.net
>>> 720-214-3643- Voice
>>> tre...@46labs.com
>>>
>>> Solutions Provider for the Telecom Industry
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Aleksey Samarin <nrg3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I have a problem with bridge.
>>> My setup is: Ubuntu/KVM.
>>> CS 4.0.0-incubating, advanced installation.
>>> 3 bridges: mgmtbr0, inetbr0 and guestbr0.
>>> mgmtbr0 - storage+management. inetbr0 - internet. guestbr0 - guest
>>> traffic.
>>> So, after install and configure, ssmv and cpvm starts well,
>>> but they can't access gateway via inetbr0.(can't ping gw from ssvm or
>>> cpvm)
>>> Trying to find the problem, ran tcpdump on kvm host and saw something
>>> like this
>>>
>>> tcpdump -i inetbr0
>>>
>>> ARP, Request who-has xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx tell hostname, length 46
>>> STP 802.1w, Rapid STP, Flags [Forward], bridge-id
>>> 8000.d0:7e:28:07:77:0e.8016, length 47
>>> IP hostname > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx UDP, length 52
>>>
>>> arp -n
>>> Address                  HWtype  HWaddress           Flags Mask
>>>            Iface
>>> 169.254.0.1              ether   fe:00:a9:fe:02:52   C
>>>                     eth0
>>>
>>> Nothing about gateway, any thoughts?
>>>
>>> All the best Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to