The problem with using -users is that -qa will often have issues that are raised during nightly testing, etc. Exposing users is often too much detail. --Alex
> -----Original Message----- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:12 PM > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; CloudStack Users > Subject: Re: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:38:57AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:32:02AM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Reaching out to community to see if we can have a dedicated QA > > > mailing list mainly to have a focused attention around QA > > > Activities. > > > > > > > > > - To discuss automation acceleration. We already have > > > sizable scripts and need to get those running in to apache env > > > > > > - Discuss QA strategy and have community participate little > > > bit more - Dev community is very active but QA is not at the same > > > level. There are too many discussions in dev mailing list already. > > > Afraid that QA may not get enough attention > > > > > > - Discuss project QA activities and track progress and > > > present relevant info to community. Intention is not to take away > > > visibility but to have a focused vision on QA. > > > > > > - Discuss other QA initiatives and have owners drive these > > > initiatives - mainly around automation frameworks, tools > > > implementation for QA > > > > > > > > > Please do express your opinion on this. > > > > > > Also I am going to setup a call to discuss ASF CS 4.1 release QA > > > activities starting next week as we are getting close to the > > > release. > > > > > > > Why not use the -users list? It's not high-traffic and QA are users > > testing/using the product? It will encourage our users to test > > alongside releases and participate in the testing process. Some of our > > users I'm sure can contribute automated tests. > > > Including the users (+cross-posting) > > > -- > Prasanna.,
