Anyone with ideas on this? Regards, Kristoffer Sheather
---------------------------------------- From: "Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central" <kristoffer.sheat...@cloudcentral.com.au> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions CloudStack Users, We are currently designing a new solution with specific security requirements and are considering implementing a Juniper SRX series firewall. In order to protect the load balancer from public traffic we intend on deploying an 'in-line' topology where the SRX sits in front of the load balancer (physical or virtual). Is it possible (and preferably tested) to use SRX for firewall/port-forwarding/VPN and use the CloudStack Virtual Router for load balancing? I know the documentation states that you must use SRX with F5 for 'in-line' mode, however I can't see why you couldn't use the virtual router instead of a F5. If anyone has experience and can advise that would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kristoffer Sheather Cloud Central Scale Your Data Center In The Cloud Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 414 573 130 | Email: k...@cloudcentral.com.au LinkedIn: | Skype: kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: http://twitter.com/kristofferjon
