Hi Zaw, Ya, we're quite familiar with Vyatta and have it available for deployment within our cloud services offering.
For this particular security requirement we need to use a physical network security gateway that has been evaluated and certified for particular compliance considerations. Regards, Kristoffer Sheather Cloud Central Scale Your Data Center In The Cloud Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 414 573 130 | Email: k...@cloudcentral.com.au LinkedIn: | Skype: kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: http://twitter.com/kristofferjon ---------------------------------------- From: "FIP)???????" <fj656...@aa.jp.fujitsu.com> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 5:25 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org, k...@cloudcentral.com.au Subject: RE: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions Hello Kris, If you have got some times please try with this software firewall and router which name is "" VYATTA "". Most of commands are same with Juniper SRX firewall. And please share me some information if you have got the results. Cheers, Zaw -----Original Message----- From: Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central [mailto:kristoffer.sheat...@cloudcentral.com.au] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:19 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: re: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions Anyone with ideas on this? Regards, Kristoffer Sheather ---------------------------------------- From: "Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central" <kristoffer.sheat...@cloudcentral.com.au> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions CloudStack Users, We are currently designing a new solution with specific security requirements and are considering implementing a Juniper SRX series firewall. In order to protect the load balancer from public traffic we intend on deploying an 'in-line' topology where the SRX sits in front of the load balancer (physical or virtual). Is it possible (and preferably tested) to use SRX for firewall/port-forwarding/VPN and use the CloudStack Virtual Router for load balancing? I know the documentation states that you must use SRX with F5 for 'in-line' mode, however I can't see why you couldn't use the virtual router instead of a F5. If anyone has experience and can advise that would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kristoffer Sheather Cloud Central Scale Your Data Center In The Cloud Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 414 573 130 | Email: k...@cloudcentral.com.au LinkedIn: | Skype: kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: http://twitter.com/kristofferjon
