On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocass...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I am afraid cloudstack never will include spice because citrix has got the > ica hdx vdi protocol . > its not up to citrix, as to what makes it into cloudstack, so I'm not sure why cloudstack wouldnt include it... esp if someone implemented it AND it were accepted by the community. I'd personally like to see this solution in cloudstack, users can enable it or the console proxy... or both! it has the potential to provide a richer desktop experience than the console proxy (sorry Kelven :p ). What i wonder is how one manages and secures the access. > As far as kvm is concerned, I read someone is working on xen spice > integration . > regards > ignazio > Il giorno 18/feb/2013 07:34, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Sunilreddy Kovvuri > > <sunil570....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I compiled spice 0.10.1.I want to use spice instead of vnc iin > > > cloudstack. How to integrate spice with cloudstack? > > > > So there are a few different places you'd need to make changes in source > > code: > > > > First - agent code to tell CloudStack to spawn machines that use SPICE > > > > Second - there's the functionality that the console proxy provides > > (essentially it proxies the vnc session to provide isolation of the > > end user from the hypervisor, and presents that as a javascript > > interface to the end user.) So I suppose you could use something like > > spice-html5. > > > > All of that said, I am not certain that this is the best path - the > > console proxy isn't really designed for true remote desktop > > functionality like RDP and SPICE provide, but rather to be something > > akin to OBM/LOM access on a physical server - good enough when you > > have no network, but not something you'd tolerate every day. It's also > > KVM-specific afaik. > > > > --David > > >
