Openstack includes spice support integrated with iptables. Any case spice integration in cloudstack could be great . Il giorno 20/feb/2013 07:23, "Ahmad Emneina" <aemne...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ignazio Cassano > <ignaziocass...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > I am afraid cloudstack never will include spice because citrix has got > the > > ica hdx vdi protocol . > > > > its not up to citrix, as to what makes it into cloudstack, so I'm not sure > why cloudstack wouldnt include it... esp if someone implemented it AND it > were accepted by the community. I'd personally like to see this solution in > cloudstack, users can enable it or the console proxy... or both! it has the > potential to provide a richer desktop experience than the console proxy > (sorry Kelven :p ). > > What i wonder is how one manages and secures the access. > > > > As far as kvm is concerned, I read someone is working on xen spice > > integration . > > regards > > ignazio > > Il giorno 18/feb/2013 07:34, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> ha scritto: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Sunilreddy Kovvuri > > > <sunil570....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I compiled spice 0.10.1.I want to use spice instead of vnc iin > > > > cloudstack. How to integrate spice with cloudstack? > > > > > > So there are a few different places you'd need to make changes in > source > > > code: > > > > > > First - agent code to tell CloudStack to spawn machines that use SPICE > > > > > > Second - there's the functionality that the console proxy provides > > > (essentially it proxies the vnc session to provide isolation of the > > > end user from the hypervisor, and presents that as a javascript > > > interface to the end user.) So I suppose you could use something like > > > spice-html5. > > > > > > All of that said, I am not certain that this is the best path - the > > > console proxy isn't really designed for true remote desktop > > > functionality like RDP and SPICE provide, but rather to be something > > > akin to OBM/LOM access on a physical server - good enough when you > > > have no network, but not something you'd tolerate every day. It's also > > > KVM-specific afaik. > > > > > > --David > > > > > >
