I found out from Edison that you need to ensure you enable local storage
when creating the zone. the global value might be ineffective for KVM.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These lines indicate you do not have a local storage pool added to
> cloudstack. I believe local storage is supposed to get added when the
> global settings are set to true. What hypervisor are you using, and did you
> add a 'presetup' primary storage? If so I believe that gets associated with
> a shared storage pool.
>
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true
>
> Ahmad
>
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:17 AM, Valery Fongang <fongang.val...@pertechtual.net>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> Below is a listing of my management server log:****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,602 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 14100, will recycle it and start a new one****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,602 INFO
> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,633 DEBUG [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Zone 4 is ready to launch console proxy****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,633 DEBUG [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Expand console proxy standby capacity for zone PTL**
> **
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,635 INFO [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Found a stopped console proxy, bring it up to running
> pool. proxy vm id : 14098****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,639 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting with
> event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,639 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for
> VM[ConsoleProxy|v-14098-VM] reservation id =
> 9e582b5b-7e46-4220-a622-3efc90ca15ae****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,646 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 4 and podId: null*
> ***
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,646 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: null
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,647 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: random****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,647 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from
> dc:4, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: 1073741824
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,647 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No**
> **
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,647 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 4*
> ***
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,648 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that
> have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 4
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,649 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) CPUOverprovisioningFactor considered: 1.0****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,653 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 4 under Pod: 4****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,653 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,653 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 4
> pod:4 cluster:4****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,655 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
> check for allocation: [Host[-5-Routing]]****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,656 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
> after prioritization: [Host[-5-Routing]]****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,656 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=1024
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,657 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 5 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 1073741824 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 28920
> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 28920****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 28920 , Requested CPU:
> 500****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24914546688 , Requested
> RAM: 1073741824****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 5, used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 28920, total with overprovisioning:
> 28920; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 5, used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24914546688; requested mem:
> 1073741824,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true***
> *
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 5****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,658 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
> suitable hosts****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,659 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
> (14098,ROOT)****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,659 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume*
> ***
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,659 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,660 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,660 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> Looking for pools in dc: 4 pod:4 cluster:4****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 1 pools to check for allocation****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: PRIMARY ,poolId: 226****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> Vol[14098|vm=14098|ROOT] under cluster: 4****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable pools found****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 4
> ****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,661 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
> this VM under any clusters, returning.****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,678 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:47,680 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy****
>
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-14098-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4****
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:723)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:461)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:454)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:598)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1096)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1869)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:155)
> ****
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:109)***
> *
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:30)**
> **
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:79)*
> ***
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:69)****
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)***
> *
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
> ****
>
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
> ****
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> ****
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
> ****
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> ****
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> ****
>
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:48,028 DEBUG
> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:51,082 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
> (AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Ping from 5****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:57,176 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running...****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:57,766 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:57,769 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-663358534: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
> 16279293006507, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } }****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:12:57,769 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:01,971 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) StorageCollector is running...****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:01,973 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
> storage host nfs://10.26.0.90/export/secondary****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:02,030 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:02,030 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 5-663358535: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
> 16279293006507, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }***
> *
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:02,030 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (StatsCollector-2:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details null****
>
> 2013-03-07 11:13:05,956 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-3:null) VmStatsCollector is running...****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com <aemne...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 06 March 2013 20:49
> *To:* Valery Fongang
> *Subject:* Re: VLAN ISSUE ON KVM HOST****
>
> ** **
>
> can you post the management server logs and cc the -user mailing list.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Valery Fongang <
> fongang.val...@pertechtual.net> wrote:****
>
> Done and even restarted the entire servers to no avail…****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 06 March 2013 17:40
> *To:* Valery Fongang****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: VLAN ISSUE ON KVM HOST****
>
> ****
>
> Have you restarted the cloudstack management service since changing the
> global parameters? If not give that a shot and let us know if that resolved
> your issue.****
>
> On Mar 5, 2013 11:35 PM, "Valery Fongang" <fongang.val...@pertechtual.net>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi,****
>
> ****
>
> Yes but how do I solve this? My dashboard is showing 1.94TB of Primary
> storage. I am using local storage and all related properties are set to
> true in Global Properties.****
>
> ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ______________________________****
>
> Sent from my iPhone****
>
>
> On 5 Mar 2013, at 18:38, "Ahmad Emneina" <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote:****
>
> you seem to have an issue with storage. there is no matching storage
> type available. ****
>
> ****
>
> see:****
>
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,281 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm****
>
> ****
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Valery Fongang <
> fongang.val...@pertechtual.net> wrote:****
>
> Hi
>
> I have made the recommended changes on my NIC and here is what my
> configuration looks like: (but I still have the error message as shown in
> last listing). My VMs still can't start...
>
>
> ################################Network Config
> ##########################################################
>
> cloud0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 76:D4:8A:DB:9C:B3****
>
> inet addr:169.254.0.1 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0**
> **
>
> inet6 addr: fe80::74d4:8aff:fedb:9cb3/64 Scope:Link****
>
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b)
>
> cloudbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13****
>
> inet addr:10.26.0.143 Bcast:10.26.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1****
>
> RX packets:3215 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2148 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:318720 (311.2 KiB) TX bytes:1490094 (1.4 MiB)****
>
>
> cloudbr1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:578 (578.0 b)
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1****
>
> RX packets:5783 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:7097 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:640522 (625.5 KiB) TX bytes:1838861 (1.7 MiB)****
>
> Interrupt:34
>
> eth0.1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13****
>
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1****
>
> RX packets:4798 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:3310 errors:0 dropped:6 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:514130 (502.0 KiB) TX bytes:1551030 (1.4 MiB)****
>
>
> eth0.200 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0****
>
> TX packets:2601 errors:0 dropped:7 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:225281 (220.0 KiB)****
>
>
> eth0.300 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0****
>
> TX packets:1179 errors:0 dropped:3 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:61972 (60.5 KiB)****
>
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1****
>
> RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:190 (190.0 b) TX bytes:190 (190.0 b)****
>
>
> virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:93:DC:18
> inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0****
>
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
> ##################################### brctl show
> #########################################################
> [root@kvm home]# brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> cloud0 8000.000000000000 no
> cloudVirBr1 8000.000000000000 no
> cloudbr0 8000.c86000589f13 yes eth0.1
> eth0.200
> cloudbr1 8000.c86000589f13 yes eth0.300
> virbr0 8000.52540093dc18 yes virbr0-nic
>
>
> ##################################### Recent Error Log
> ####################################################
>
>
> 2013-03-05 16:30:57,278 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-11510-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,117 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,139 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,140 WARN
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11536-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,141 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 11536, will recycle it and start a new one
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,288 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,303 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:31:27,304 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-11510-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,177 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,193 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,194 WARN
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11537-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,199 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 11537, will recycle it and start a new one
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,263 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,280 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:31:57,281 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-11510-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,117 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,133 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,135 WARN
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11537-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,135 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 11537, will recycle it and start a new one
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,281 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,298 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:32:27,299 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-11510-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,174 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,189 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,190 WARN
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11538-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,191 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 11538, will recycle it and start a new one
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,263 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable
> to find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,278 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
> 2013-03-05 16:32:57,280 WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-11510-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4
>
>
> ######################################################################################################
> ****
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]****
>
> Sent: 04 March 2013 16:56
> To: Valery Fongang
> Cc: Cloudstack users
> Subject: Re: VLAN ISSUE ON KVM HOST
>
> I believe you need to assign cloudbr0 an IP address and use that for guest
> public and private interface. Cloudstack will tag and bridge public and
> guest traffic accordingly, if you're using an advanced zone. Give that a
> try and let us know if you get any further.
>
> Ahmad
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:52 AM, Valery Fongang <fongang.val...@pertechtual.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My physical switch is configured with 3 Vlans (vlan1, vlan200 and
> vlan300) and the host is on a tagged trunk port. I must admit I am a bit
> confused on how I have to match this in the
> /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties config file. I have played a little bit
> around with it hoping to get it working to no avail. Below is the
> configuration on my host and the content of the agent.properties config
> file. Please let me know how you think my agent.properties file needs to
> be configured. Also note that my Public IPs and IPs on the POD (host and
> Cloud Stack Management Server) are all accessible only via vlan1.
> >
> > [root@kvm ~]# ifconfig
> > cloud0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr B2:E1:19:7B:B7:B0
> > inet addr:169.254.0.1 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::b0e1:19ff:fe7b:b7b0/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b)
> >
> > cloudbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:578 (578.0 b)
> >
> > cloudbr1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:578 (578.0 b)
> >
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:143358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:145099 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:25198081 (24.0 MiB) TX bytes:25801567 (24.6 MiB)
> > Interrupt:34
> >
> > eth0.1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet addr:10.26.0.143 Bcast:10.26.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:138979 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:70589 errors:0 dropped:8 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:22987031 (21.9 MiB) TX bytes:21894019 (20.8 MiB)
> >
> > eth0.200 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:37251 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:1953440 (1.8 MiB)
> >
> > eth0.300 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C8:60:00:58:9F:13
> > inet6 addr: fe80::ca60:ff:fe58:9f13/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:37252 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:1953530 (1.8 MiB)
> >
> > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> > RX packets:62 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:62 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:6944 (6.7 KiB) TX bytes:6944 (6.7 KiB)
> >
> > virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:93:DC:18
> > inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > [root@kvm ~]# cat /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties #Storage #Wed Feb
> > 27 13:54:27 GMT 2013
> > guest.network.device=cloudbr0
> > workers=5
> > private.network.device=eth0.1
> > port=8250
> > resource=com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource
> > pod=4
> > vm.migrate.speed=1000
> > zone=4
> > guid=8e0e7646-93d0-357d-b44c-e5ec4088fdeb
> > cluster=4
> > public.network.device=eth0.1
> > local.storage.uuid=417c7db1-2249-49e8-949f-3bd681cdc0cd
> > domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
> > LibvirtComputingResource.id=5
> > host=10.26.0.90
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: 27 February 2013 19:15
> > To: Cloudstack users; 'aemne...@gmail.com'
> > Subject: RE: StoragePool is not of correct type
> >
> > The error is creating vlan on your kvm host failed. May need to take a
> look at your bridge configuration on kvm host.
> > 1. check /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties, what's the value of
> public.network.device?
> > 2. Is the bridge name get from above 1st step listed on your kvm host?
> "brctl show" will show you the result.
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Valery Fongang [mailto:fongang.val...@pertechtual.net]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:45 AM
> >> To: Cloudstack users; 'aemne...@gmail.com'
> >> Subject: RE: StoragePool is not of correct type
> >>
> >> Hi Ahmad,
> >>
> >> Thanks for you great input that got me one step further. I had
> >> system.vm.use.local.storage set to true but use.local.storage was
> >> still on false. After setting the later to true I got pass the
> >> previous error message and I was able to see system VMs could pick up
> >> a public , private and link local IP address. However the state of my
> >> system VMs stays on Starting and goes back to Stopped after a while.
> >> Below is the error part of the CMS log. Any Suggestions?...
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,636 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> >> (AgentManager-
> >> Handler-6:null) Seq 5-1496055849: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
> >> 16279293006507, via: 5, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
> >> [{"StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":1423,"name":"v-1423-
> >> VM","type":"ConsoleProxy","cpus":1,"speed":500,"minRam":1073741824,"m
> >> axRam":1073741824,"arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (32-
> >> bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP type=consoleproxy host=10.26.0.90
> >> port=8250 name=v-1423-VM premium=true zone=4 pod=4 guid=Proxy.1423
> >> proxy_vm=1423 disable_rp_filter=true eth2ip=172.18.1.11
> >> eth2mask=255.255.0.0 gateway=172.18.1.1 eth0ip=169.254.1.117
> >> eth0mask=255.255.0.0 eth1ip=10.26.0.134 eth1mask=255.255.0.0
> >> mgmtcidr=10.26.0.0/16 localgw=10.26.0.1 internaldns1=10.26.0.160
> >> internaldns2=8.8.8.8 dns1=10.26.0.160
> >>
> dns2=8.8.8.8","rebootOnCrash":false,"enableHA":false,"limitCpuUse":false,"
> >> vncPassword":"3d03cc1bad8ede6b","params":{},"disks":[{"id":1423,"name":"
> >> ROOT-1423","mountPoint":"/var/lib/libvirt/images/","path":"706fda6a-0
> >> d
> >> cc-
> >> 4ba2-8ff0-
> >> 63a5fd0214a5","size":139264,"type":"ROOT","storagePoolType":"Filesystem"
> >> ,"storagePoolUuid":"417c7db1-2249-49e8-949f-
> >> 3bd681cdc0cd","deviceId":0}],"nics":[{"deviceId":2,"networkRateMbps":
> >> -
> >> 1,"defaultNic":true,"ip":"172.18.1.11","netmask":"255.255.0.0","gatew
> >> a
> >> y":"1
> >>
> 72.18.1.1","mac":"06:be:2e:00:00:0d","dns1":"10.26.0.160","dns2":"8.8.8.8","
> >> broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Public","broadcastUri":"vlan://1","isol
> >> a
> >> tionUr
> >> i":"vlan://1","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false},{"deviceId":0,"networkR
> >> a
> >> teMb
> >> ps":-
> >>
> 1,"defaultNic":false,"ip":"169.254.1.117","netmask":"255.255.0.0","gateway":
> >>
> "169.254.0.1","mac":"0e:00:a9:fe:01:75","broadcastType":"LinkLocal","type":
> ****
>
> >> "Control","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false},{"deviceId":1,"networkRateM
> >> b
> >> ps
> >> ":-****
>
> >> 1,"defaultNic":false,"ip":"10.26.0.134","netmask":"255.255.0.0","gate
> >> w
> >> ay":"1
> >> 0.26.0.1","mac":"06:ee:c2:00:00:05","broadcastType":"Native","type":"
> >> M
> >> ana
> >> gement","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false}]},"result":false,"details":"F**
> **
>
> >> a iled to create vnet 1: java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat****
>
> >> java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:457)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.utils.script.Script.execute(Script.java:177)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.utils.script.Script.execute(Script.java:155)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.createVne
> >> t (LibvirtComputingResource.java:2112)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.createVla
> >> n Br(LibvirtComputingResource.java:2692)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.createVif**
> **
>
> >> ( Li bvirtComputingResource.java:2726)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.createVif
> >> ( Li bvirtComputingResource.java:2744)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.createVif
> >> s ( LibvirtComputingResource.java:2489)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(L
> >> i b virtComputingResource.java:2512)\n\tat****
>
> >> com.cloud.agent.resource.computing.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRe
> >> quest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:985)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:517)\n\tat
> >> com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:827)\n\ta
> >> t com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:79)\n\tat
> >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> >> j
> >> av
> >> a:1146)\n\tat
> >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> >> ja
> >> va:615)\n\tat
> >> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)\n","wait":0}},{"Answer":{"resul**
> **
>
> >> t ":fals e,"details":"Stopped by previous failure","wait":0}}] }****
>
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,636 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (consoleproxy-1:null) Cleanup failed due to Failed to create vnet 1:
> >> java.lang.NullPointerException
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,637 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (consoleproxy-1:null) Cleanup failed due to Stopped by previous
> >> failure
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,638 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (AgentManager-Handler-6:null) Cleanup failed due to Failed to create
> vnet 1:
> >> java.lang.NullPointerException
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,639 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (AgentManager-Handler-6:null) Cleanup failed due to Stopped by
> >> previous failure
> >> 2013-02-27 10:42:41,644 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >> (consoleproxy-1:null) Unable to start VM on Host[-5-Routing] due to
> >> Failed to create vnet 1: java.lang.NullPointerException [root@cms ~]#
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: 26 February 2013 19:15
> >> To: Cloudstack users
> >> Subject: Re: StoragePool is not of correct type
> >>
> >> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >> (consoleproxy-1:null) Is storage pool shared? true
> >> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >> (consoleproxy-1:null) StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping
> >> this pool
> >>
> >> this might be your issue. are your system vm's set to use local storage?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Valery Fongang <
> >> fongang.val...@pertechtual.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,****
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with KVM hypervisor (on Centos
> >>> 3.0) and I am running into a number of issues. At this time I have
> >>> managed to get up to the following stage:****
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> **- **Cloud Management Server installed.****
> >>>
> >>> **- **Host installed with KVM.****
> >>>
> >>> **- **Zone-Cluster-Pod-Host-Primary Storage- Secondary all
> setup
> >>> and displaying on Cloudstack dashboard.****
> >>>
> >>> **- **System VM templates are available in Templates but no
> >>> Centos Template.****
> >>>
> >>> **- **System VMs were generated but unable to boot.****
> >>>
> >>> **- **My Cloud Management Server Log shows the following:****
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,119 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting
> >>> with
> >>> event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null
> >>> host id before state transition: null****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,119 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for
> >>> VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1423-VM] reservation id =
> >>> a2d3825d-ffc7-411c-92ec-fc0872247923****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,127 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 4 and podId:
> >>> null*
> >>> ***
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,128 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts:
> >>> null
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,129 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
> >>> random****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,129 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools
> >>> from dc:4, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram:
> >>> 1073741824
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,129 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?:
> >>> No**
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,129 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this
> >>> Zone: 4*
> >>> ***
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,130 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate
> >>> capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM
> >>> capacity under this Zone: 4
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,130 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) CPUOverprovisioningFactor considered: 1.0****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,139 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 4 under Pod:
> >>> 4****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,139 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable
> >>> hosts****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,139 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 4
> >>> pod:4 cluster:4****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,141 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1
> >>> hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-5-Routing]]****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,142 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for
> >>> allocation after prioritization: [Host[-5-Routing]]****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,142 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz,
> >>> Ram=1024
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,143 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 5 has
> >>> enough capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 1073741824
> >>> ,
> >>> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU:
> >>> 28920 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 28920****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 28920 , Requested
> CPU:
> >>> 500****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24914546688 ,
> >>> Requested
> >>> RAM: 1073741824****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and
> >>> RAM
> >>> available****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from
> host:
> >>> 5, used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 28920, total with
> overprovisioning:
> >>> 28920; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> >>> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from
> host:
> >>> 5, used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24914546688; requested mem:
> >>> 1073741824,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?:
> >>> true***
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host,
> >>> adding to
> >>> list: 5****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,145 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
> >>> suitable hosts****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,146 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
> >>> (1423,ROOT)****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,146 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this
> >>> volume*
> >>> ***
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,146 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable
> >>> pools
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,146 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> >>> LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the
> >>> vm****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,146 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Looking for pools in dc: 4 pod:4
> >>> cluster:4****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 1 pools to
> >>> check for allocation****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking if storage pool is suitable, name:
> >>> PRIMARY ,poolId: 224****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Is localStorageAllocationNeeded? true****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Is storage pool shared? true****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping
> >>> this pool****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0
> >>> suitable storage pools****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> >>> LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG
> >>> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (consoleproxy-1:null)
> >>> Unable to find storage pool to fit the vm****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> >>> Vol[1423|vm=1423|ROOT] under cluster: 4****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable pools found****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this
> >>> Cluster: 4
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,147 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination
> >>> for this VM under any clusters, returning.****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,165 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped
> >>> with
> >>> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null
> >>> host id before state transition: null****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,166 WARN
> >>> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> >>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console
> >>> proxy****
> >>>
> >>> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
> >>> create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1423-VM]Scope=interface
> >>> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=4****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineMa
> >> na
> >>> gerImpl.java:723)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerIm
> >> pl
> >>> .java:461)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerIm
> >> pl
> >>> .java:454)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProx
> >> y
> >>> ManagerImpl.java:598)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleP
> >> r
> >>> oxyManagerImpl.java:1096)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsolePr
> >> oxy
> >>> ManagerImpl.java:1869)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsolePr
> >> oxy
> >>> ManagerImpl.java:155)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java
> >> :109
> >>> )***
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.ja
> >> va:3
> >>> 0)**
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.j
> >> ava:
> >>> 79)*
> >>> ***
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:69
> >> )*
> >>> ***
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:4
> >>> 71
> >>> )***
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
> >>> 351)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
> >> a
> >>> ccess$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask
> >>> .r
> >>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor
> >>> .j
> >>> ava:1110)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> >>> java:603)
> >>> ****
> >>>
> >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:01:58,468 DEBUG
> >>> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> >>> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.****
> >>>
> >>> 2013-02-26 17:02:00,013 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
> >>> (AgentManager-Handler-7:null) Ping from 5****
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> Can someone give me an idea on how to solve this issue?...****
> >>>
> >>> ** **
> >>>
> >>> **- ******
> >>>****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
>
