On 13.03.2013 19:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
On 13.03.2013 01:42, Outback Dingo wrote:
one word, one filesystem, ZFS
If you want to scale you need Ceph/GlusterFS/XtreemeFS/etc. ZFS is
for
when you only have one NFS server and you don't want to grow.
Well thats not exactly true, ZFS can be used in various environments
of
which scalability is required also. Many people dont realize stacking
swift, on top of ZFS provides one such environment if scalability is
required, the original question was about replication, if your going
to
throw scalability into play, it can
also be accomplished with ZFS included in the mix with a clustering
solution
Agreed to the swift idea, but in this particular case he needs to
replicate MS SQL. He needs a distributed filesystem of some sort or
something like Gallera, but for MS SQL. I'm sure Microsoft developed
something like this considering the amazing prices they charge for it.
;-)
Anyway, 1500 miles will add a lot of latency ... I'm curious how this
will end up. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
