Maybe MSSQL AlwaysOn? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/gg490638
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > On 13.03.2013 19:09, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >> >> On 13.03.2013 01:42, Outback Dingo wrote: >>> >>> one word, one filesystem, ZFS >>>> >>>> >>> If you want to scale you need Ceph/GlusterFS/XtreemeFS/etc. ZFS is for >>> when you only have one NFS server and you don't want to grow. >>> >>> >> Well thats not exactly true, ZFS can be used in various environments of >> which scalability is required also. Many people dont realize stacking >> swift, on top of ZFS provides one such environment if scalability is >> required, the original question was about replication, if your going to >> throw scalability into play, it can >> also be accomplished with ZFS included in the mix with a clustering >> solution >> > > Agreed to the swift idea, but in this particular case he needs to > replicate MS SQL. He needs a distributed filesystem of some sort or > something like Gallera, but for MS SQL. I'm sure Microsoft developed > something like this considering the amazing prices they charge for it. ;-) > > Anyway, 1500 miles will add a lot of latency ... I'm curious how this will > end up. :) > > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro >
