What are you running again?  My experience is based on NT, if memory serves.
It let me change it, then it had a hairy fit at me.  :-)  Maybe if you're
running something newer, at least Microsoft thought that one through and
made it a bit more sensible.

And by the way, don't do that again, you had me worried.  At 9:14 you said
"if you don't hear from me in the next few minutes...".  By 9:45 I was
starting to think you really had blown up your machine just to prove a
point.  ;-)

Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (clug-talk) XP, Win2k Advanced Server and Linux
>
>
> I'm wrong.
>
> It won't even allow me to change it.
>
> Kev.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: (clug-talk) XP, Win2k Advanced Server and Linux
>
>
> > I'll change my C: drive to a D: drive right now.  If I confirm that it's
> > working, then we're good.  If you don't hear from me in the next few
> > minutes, then I was wrong.
> >
> > Kev.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) XP, Win2k Advanced Server and Linux
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Kevin Anderson wrote:
> > > > Even if 2K labels a drive wrong, for example, it makes the drive you
> > want as
> > > > C: into the D: drive, you can still change it.  Go to computer
> > management,
> > > > and give the disk a new label.  You'll need to make D: into X: then
> make
> > C:
> > > > into D: and finally X: into C:.
> > >
> > > there are a ton of 'c:\...' strings in the registry, and not just from
> 3rd
> > > party software, does the disk management console also go through the
> > > registry and patch all the paths that need changing  whenerver it
> > > reletters a partition?
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to