> Look at the differences from 95 to 98, etc. Sure, apples to oranges...
Maybe, but the difference between 95 OSR2.5 w/IE4's Active Desktop is nothing. > Things I think that need improvement, that keeps windows users using > windows. > Program installation > Drivers! > XFree86, its ugly to configure. > A competitive office suite, MS office is still better. > A fast, light weight, stable web browser. > to name a few. And the number of times an end user (rather than the corporate geek) is expected to configure these is? Exactly... Zero. Do you use a Win2K box as a router? The Cisco IOS has the same issues, right? So they are irrelevant. I used OO in a pure MS environment for over a year, no body noticed. Weekly status reports, various other reports and documentation. No difference. Troubleshooting XL issues? Generally also no problem. Let me rephrase, no problem for spreadsheets that end users developed themselves. VBA is an obvious exception, but end users don't use it. Ummm, and a Lightweight Browser for The legacy OS would be what? I assume you mean IE, but clearly we have a different idea of what makes something lightweight... Kev.
