-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 January 2003 02:15, Ian Bruseker wrote:
> static sort of thing), but giving you the advange of having all the rest of
> the info that travels with DHCP (like name server lists and such) being
> controlled centrally. That's the one use I've ever heard of for them.
yes... i've even done this ... usually it's unecessary, but sometimes it's
quite handy when you have systems that you need to know the IP addy of and/or
keep the address static (e.g. servers) without having to resort to
configuring the machines individually...
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Ff7Z1rcusafx20MRArUkAKCUz7B3xF6ULfChjycVEcyZZqUwCgCeK5Mp
CtZfVQ0ggA389UH62GPWKu4=
=CPIP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
