William Astle said:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Trevor Lauder wrote:
>
>> A word may be legitimate for some if it's generally understood, however
>> the use of slang & vulgarity shows a lack of intelligence.  Yes, it is
>> all
>> about communication but there are varying levels of communication.  Some
>> levels help you look like an intelligent person, other levels do not and
>> only exist due to a lack of education.
>
> I would like to point out that the above paragraph implies a connection
> between "intelligence" and "education" when, in fact, there is little
> correlation. A person can be stunningly intelligent yet use slang and
> vulgarity. This happens to be one of my pet peeves with "popular culture"
> portraying high intelligence as knowing everything under the sun rather
> than the *ability* to learn/reason/etc.

True, but answer this question then.  Why, if someone really is
"stunningly intelligent", do they choose to use slang and vulgarity in the
place of a proper noun, pronoun, verb, adverb, adjective, or preposition? 
Such practice is unbecoming of someone who is truly intelligent (Someone
who can "learn/reason/etc").

>
> I should point out that I do not believe Trevor intended to make the
> implication I conjured out of his comment.

Yes, I should have explained myself further :)

>
> I will also concur that certain usages of language certainly are an
> indicator of lack of education, or at very least lack of care in the use
> of language. And, most certainly, it is a popular perception that lack of
> education equates with lack of intelligence.

Yes, I agree, in rare cases it is laziness or apathy and not lack of
education.  I think in most cases though where a person uses that type of
language constantly, it is because that is the only vocabulary they
possess :)

>
> And now that I've managed to take the step from having everyone think I'm
> a fool to proving it... :)

Haha

>
> --
> William Astle
> finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for further information
>
> Geek Code V3.12: GCS/M/S d- s+:+ !a C++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ !E W++ !N w--- !O
> !M PS PE V-- Y+ PGP t+@ 5++ X !R tv+@ b+++@ !DI D? G e++ h+ y?
>
>

Reply via email to