Hi Funny how meany people can not appriciate the fact, that ispite of linux being open source (hence any flaw can be very easily found and exploited) still has far less exploitable/exploited flaws then vintage os, despite the source is being kept as top-secret-for-onone-eyes-only. And i dont think vintage has as large a base as vintage would like us to think. That number comes from sales-figures (oem vintage os). Now how long would a vintage-os last on a hard-disk after it gets home ?? Hehe, till i find my Linux cds :-) Cheers Szemir
Ps: Soorry , too mutch Balantines :-] On Thursday 25 September 2003 22:47, you wrote: > More secure, less secure... Currently, one must place more value on the > process of disclosure and patching since no software is totally secure. In > that vote, Open Source and Linux win hands down. At least, it makes _me_ > feel more secure (knowing what's going on and what's been fixed). > > So I voted 'Yes'. :-D > > Curtis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: September 25, 2003 10:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (clug-talk) Voting Booth > > > http://www.securitypipeline.com/newslettervote.jhtml > > We might as well weigh in...
