Hi Tom. I think this might be an unfortunate incident where email is not always the best communication tool. Sometimes a perfectly innocent message may come across as being very terse. My personal take on the previous messages was more along the lines of "right, security might be a problem, lets take some steps to minimize these issues."
Also, on a mailing list, if you reply to a message, chances are the response is going to the whole mailing list. Of course, the list administrators might be able to alter this so a response goes to only the original sender, but that defeats the purpose of a mailing list. I myself recently made a blooper with regards to this and inadvertently sent a message to the list that was only intended for a single person. I hope you you are able to consider any potentially offending messages in a different light (considering emotions and tone of voice doesn't always come across right), and see them for the helpful tips they were intended as. Looking forward to seeing you at the meeting, and hopefully your wireless works well. (I've yet to take the wireless plunge...) Shawn On Wednesday 25 August 2004 17:29, Tom Weniger wrote: > Greetings Jarrod, > > Perhaps if you fixed the reply to: portion of your email it would work. > > Sheez! Don't worry everyone. I probably won't have the wireless setup > right anyway. > > What do I have to do to get a refund around here.... _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
