On November 4, 2004 20:59, Jim Suydam wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:14:47 -0700, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 04 November 2004 19:29, Aaron Seigo wrote: > > > the idea i've tossed out there is to have multiple tracks at each > > > meeting. > > Another way to handle the multiple tracks is to have 2 presentations > at each meeting. Since some presentations would require more time > than the 40 - 60 minutes allowed, a presentation could be split into 2 > or more parts and presented in successive months.
and then we bore 100% of the people 50% of the time ;-) those who aren't interested in topic A during that presentation, and those who aren't into topic B during that one. ok, there'll be some people who are interested in both. but if we're having two presentations, why can't they be in parallel? gives more time for each and lowers the % of bored people (hopefully ;) -- Aaron J. Seigo Society is Geometric
pgpAQSyUVJxAS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
