Ballmer had a discrepancy in the math - I think the number was supposed to be 283 patents. But, out of all the (potentially) infringing patents, maybe MS isn't counting the ones they own? Or maybe they are only concerned about the ones they DO own?
Shawn On Thursday 18 November 2004 13:42, bogi wrote: > Hey, the numbers are going down, it is 200 now. > That might signal the fact the linux does violate the difference between > the number stated initially "more than 228" and the current number (200), > what do you know, it could violate 28 .... maybe, this proves that the > speaker did not check his facts, just fudged the number. > Cheers > Szemir > _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
