On Wednesday 09 February 2005 22:18, Niels Voll wrote: > so why bring up something that is ancient history - are you FUD'ing? If
because you said you would be interested in the documents I mentioned (and which I said my knowledge was out of date on). I found them and posted them... no FUD here, just a simple response to a statement. > But then you slammed that alternative with some rather unsubstantiated > general statements. I'm saying, the slamming was unfair, and if I wanted > to slam, I could apply it to SSH, too. Forgive me. My intent was not intended "slam" you or your comments. But rather raise some security concerns which had been raised to me when I was initially looking at webmin some time ago. And I even tried to soften the message by specifically apologizing to you and stating why I felt I had to comment. Maybe I need to use more smilies?? :) Please re-read that exchange again - I did not intend to slam you, and I did state my knowledge was dated. I am now in a position that I feel slammed unjustly - you asked for samples of the documents I indicated, so I provided them, then I get told I'm wrong to do so? How about we end our "disagreement" on this note: Webmin/VNC/SSH/or any other remote management tool has to be properly managed to account for the security of the specific network(s) it is being used on. A nice generic statement which is good advice no matter what technology you find to be your favorite. Shawn _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
