Shawn, can you please keep us informed of your findings if you do go this 
route.  I don't have any IIS servers, but I'm still curious to know how this 
works.

THanks
Kev.

On Thursday 17 February 2005 02:29, Shawn wrote:
> I did a quick review of SecureIIS
> (http://www.eeye.com/html/products/secureiis/), and it looks like it might
> do most of what I'm after.  I'm assuming you've used this?  Or is this a
> case of you only being aware of the tool ?  Either way is good, but if
> you've used it, I'd be interested to hear your opinion regarding
> effectiveness and performance.  Also, are there any tricks to installation?
>  Does  it need to be installed before the application server?  Can it be
> easily installed afterwards?  Do you have a ballpark figure on the cost for
> this? (I'll contact a sales rep after I have a little more data from the
> field... <grins>)
>
> I'm wondering about the performance because the IIS, Cold Fusion
> Application Server, and MSSQL server are all on the same box (for now).  If
> I add in SecureIIS, how badly will performance be affected?  The data sheet
> (http://www.eeye.com/~data/publish/collateral/secureiis/secureiisDS.FILE.pd
>f) says performance is a non-issue because they implement it as an ISAPI
> filter, but I try not to take claims like this seriously until either I've
> proven the case, or someone reputable has...  I'll consider you reputable
> on this <grins>) .
>
> As load/performance issues increase on the server, we'll move the database
> server to it's own box, but for now with only approx 40 users it isn't
> under a heavy load (well, it could use more memory, but it's only JUST
> tapping into swap space if we leave it running for more than a month
> between reboots). And of course, when we go 'live' with Internet access to
> this server, it'll be properly located in a DMZ to minimize any potential
> impact/hacks on the internal network.
>
> Thanks for any insight Cade (or anyone else that may have experience with
> SecureIIS).
>
> Shawn
>
> On Wednesday 16 February 2005 10:14, Cade Cairns wrote:
> > Wouldn't a product like SecureIIS be a better solution? How do you
> > intend to scan for known attacks? What about unknown ones?
>
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to