We must "be of an age". The IBM 360 was all we had- with card decks, no
less- other than the Wang calculator that was chained to a table in the
hallway. I had to take lots of math- but it wasn't my major. The mathies
would talk COBOL and SNOBAL at meals . . .  So at 45 when I needed to
re-learn how to use computers, since I didn't know how they were programmed,
I didn't trust some of the things they were doing. Had to get over that, go
with it and get on with the work.

Ellen

On 24 February 2011 20:26, Ellen Mably <[email protected]> wrote:

> How funny was it when people were stressing out about Y2K and one of the
> few languages I had used was Fortran which had been used to programme
> devices without a thought for what to do about the turn of the century.
> Apparently, there weren't many programmers around who still knew Fortran. .
> .
>
> -Technopeasant
>
>
> On 24 February 2011 18:51, Gustin Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If they were well known or named formats it would not be a problem.
>> Simon's example is excellent.  There is a sea of dead and extinct
>> formats from the late 70s through the early 90's.  I use the word
>> format loosely, as some of these systems were one offs for people like
>> libraries, school systems, and mid to large size companies.  Perhaps
>> you are lucky in that seismic data can be read 50 years later, but
>> this is not the norm.
>>
>> How many of your digital files from the 80s or 90s can still be read?
>> My dad has a box of floppies for his Apple IIc, that has databases and
>> word processing files.  How easy is it for him to get that data on to
>> his modern PC?  I have personally used utilities like strings to get
>> data out of old formats (assuming that I was lucky enough to have data
>> in a format that used good ol ASCII) for files I created myself and I
>> am only 35. Most of my early university papers are mostly unreadable
>> in modern word processors.  Ironically, the ones I did in TeX/Latex
>> would still be readable if I had kept them.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:00 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Obsolete formats?  Please advise which.
>> >
>> > It happens to everyone in the end... even NASA had issues reading
>> magnetic
>> > tapes containing digitised high resolution images from the Lunar
>> Orbiter.
>> >
>> > That is until some determined engineers got obsessed with the project:
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Orbiter_Image_Recovery_Project
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > clug-talk mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
>> > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
>> > **Please remove these lines when replying
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> clug-talk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
>> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
>> **Please remove these lines when replying
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to