A number of points about your insightful comments:
1/ Kin has already voiced concern for ease of report generation as a
show stopper. After all, computers ARE supposed to make the job easier,
correct?
2/ So what license would the authors reporting solutions be under? 
The full program should be powerful, comprehensive, and easy to use,..
yet I seem to suspect some sort of cripple ware system. 
3/ Is ad hoc reporting solvable in the other fork?

Mel


On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 11:02 -0700, Shawn Grover wrote:
> I've used SQL-Ledger in the past, though it has been years.  My 
> experience was that as an accounting system, it was pretty solid.  There 
> was some dispute around management of the project and a fork was started 
> (LedgerSMB).  I'm not sure of the state of either project as I stopped 
> using it.  (The owner left a bad taste with me when I submitted a 
> support question asking how to go about modifying one of the reports, 
> and he responded with a modified report and an invoice expecting to be 
> paid for the "work I asked him to do"...).
> 
> In the end, the complex reporting system was the nail in the coffin for 
> SQL-Ledger (for me).  It uses LaTeX to generate the reports which are 
> output in PDF format.  While tweaking LaTeX was "fun", asking the system 
> for any information not already provided required modifications to the 
> report AND the underlying system that only the author seemed to be able 
> to do.  So creating custom or ad hoc reports via the system was cost 
> prohibitive.
> 
> But SQL-Ledger *was* under active development.  It looks like it still 
> is (he's calling it an ERP system now and not just an accounting 
> system...)  So, things may have changed drastically since I last looked 
> at it.
> 
> Food for thought
> 
> Shawn
> 
> On 11-11-24 09:15 PM, Hendrik Schaink wrote:
> > You may want take SQL-Ledger in consideration, published and supported
> > by an Edmonton company. Highly capable and configurable, it appears to
> > have special appeal for larger organizations with more intricate
> > bookkeeping requirements.
> >
> > Description page:
> > http://www.sql-ledger.com/cgi-bin/nav.pl?page=about.html&title=About
> >
> > Features page:
> > http://www.sql-ledger.com/cgi-bin/nav.pl?page=features.html&title=Features
> >
> > Home page: http://www.sql-ledger.com/
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> >
> > Hendrik
> >
> >
> > On 24/11/11 10:20 AM, Royce Souther wrote:
> >> Is anyone using accounting software on Linux? I was looking at Quasar from
> >> http://linuxcanada.com they are a Calgary company and I know a lot of
> >> people that are using it but my new client needs payroll and job costing
> >> and it looks like Quasar does not have that. Quasar can export to a payroll
> >> program but they do not say what that program could be.
> >>
> >> Recommendations please.
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > clug-talk mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> > **Please remove these lines when replying
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying



_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to