On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:16:17PM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > I think the "right thing to do" at this point is this: > > 1. Patch #1 is already upstream > 2. Patch #2 stands on its own, so I think this should go forward. > 3. Combine patches 3, 4 and 5, which ought to provide a comprehensive fix > for the other problems listed in #1. > 4. The rest of the patches, I can post as separate patches because they are > code cleanups, not related to the original problems of #1. > > Let me know your thoughts on the subject. If you like this plan, I can > re-test and post replacement patches tomorrow (hopefully).
That sounds good.
