On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 18:56 +0300, Michael Boccara wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 17:31 +0300, Michael Boccara wrote: > > > > > Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a problem? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess my problem comes from the fact that I am using the source > > > tar.bz2 (from http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/cluttermm/) and > > > not the svn repository (so my using of the 'repository' term was > > > confusing I admit). > > > > > > In the downloadable archive there is a configure file, > > > > > > > Of course. That's entirely normal. You'll find the same in other source > > tarballs, so you can build with just configure and make. > > > > > OK, I learned something: so the usage in source tarballs is to not > having it dependent on autoconf. > > > as well as both the .hg and .h, and both the .ccg and .cc files. > > > > So I should understand that gmmproc is to be called at the autoconf > stage, or some time off line ? > Or is it still wrong to have the actor.h and actor.cc files part of > the source tarballs ? > > I am just wondering whether I should distribute new actors via the .hg > and .ccg files only.
The .hg and .ccg files are only used to autogenerate C++ headers and source files that wrap the underlying C calls. You do only need those if you wrap custom actors written in C, otherwise simply create a new class deriving from Clutter::Actor as you would do normally in C++. > -- > Michael Boccara > Graphtech > Herzliya, Israel > > -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
