Using CTypes we no longer get clutter wrapped around GObject. Or am I wrong? imho this is a very important matter due to the type of library we are talking about. Developing on top of clutter for example, makes total sense to use Gobject, even tho we're talking about python here. Any thoughts on this?
Jan. On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/21 Damien Boucard - UbiCast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi ! > > > > Following Emmanuele's "starting the bindings from scratch" thread > > (Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:18), I decided to write a proof of concept for > > python bindings in ctypes. > > Have you take a look at pybank? It's the new generation pygtk bindings > based on gobject introspection, it also works on runtime based on the > introspection information around the classes that you want to wrap. I > would take a look at that effort before to go any further. > > > -- > Cheers, > Alberto Ruiz > -- > To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
