Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Robert Bragg <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd personally be fairly happy with the flush type approach; but I'd > take the opportunity to add something like cogl_flush_gl_state() which I > think would tie into ideas we've discussed in the past about improving > the ability to break out of Cogl into raw GL.
Internally to COGL, maybe you want to keep a _cogl_flush_matrices() distinct from flushing 'everything' but make the public API just a 'flush everything'? Something like that makes sense to me. Havoc -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
