When I fix a bug, I mark it as "resolved." I expect that somebody else who cares about the bug will come along behind me and double-check me on it. So... I leave it to the reporter or some other interested party to "close" it.
If there is consensus that this approach is undesirable, I'd be happy to just "close" them instead of "resolving" them. Why does it matter, as long as they are not "open" anymore? On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org>wrote: > Hi, > > there are currently 169 RESOLVED issues for cmake: > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view_all_bug_page.php?filter=40216 > > Should they all just be changed to CLOSED ? > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > cmake-developers mailing list > cmake-developers@cmake.org > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers >
_______________________________________________ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
