2012/1/3 Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com>:
> On 1/3/2012 11:45 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>>
>> this is due to the fact I did already merge it
>> (the beginning of the old stage/ImproveCPackDoc)
>> to next before 2.8.7  in the hope that it would be included in 2.8.7:
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10067#c27793
>>
>> It was dropped because "ImproveCPackDoc" as a whole wasn't considered
>> ready
>> which was off course true...
>
> [snip]
>
>> Tell me how you would like me to handle my.... mess :-(
>
>
> Start a new topic "ImproveCPackDoc-revert" from the last commit on the
> original topic that was merged to 'next'.  Then revert all the commits
> that had been merged so far in reverse order.  Merge that to next.
> Then your rebased topics should merge cleanly.

OK, done for
Merge topic 'ImproveCPackDoc-part1' into next

d2c9626 Document undocumented (but existing) cpack options (fix #0010134)

Pushing upstream next
To g...@cmake.org:cmake.git

I did remove old ImproveCPackDoc from stage.
I did remove old CMake-completion-improvement from stage as well
and I'll push something clean without reference to potential cpack enhancement
in a new topic.

-- 
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to