Stephen Kelly wrote: > Brad King wrote: > >> On 11/29/2012 07:34 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >>> The patch that added that line is >>> d899eb71b52616c9e3f3f5987f229619605e632b. It is apparently there for >>> strict backwards compatibility, but it is not clear what exactly needs >>> to be backwards compatible there. Any idea about that? >> >> I don't know off the top of my head, Dave? >> >> Stephen, please add the policy that the d899eb71 commit message >> suggests. Only bother with expansion if the policy is OLD or >> not set. > > Ok, I'll wait until we hear from Dave so I can write a well-informed > commit message.
I guess I'll also hit a problem with the policy number to use. In my branches in next I introduce CMP0019 and CMP0020. For simplicity, can I make this CMP0021 and make the topic depend on the tll-set-include-and-defines-requirements topic? Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
