Looking at this now, will reply in just a minute
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > Brad King wrote: > > > On 11/29/2012 07:34 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> The patch that added that line is > >> d899eb71b52616c9e3f3f5987f229619605e632b. It is apparently there for > >> strict backwards compatibility, but it is not clear what exactly needs > to > >> be backwards compatible there. Any idea about that? > > > > I don't know off the top of my head, Dave? > > > > Stephen, please add the policy that the d899eb71 commit message > > suggests. Only bother with expansion if the policy is OLD or > > not set. > > Ok, I'll wait until we hear from Dave so I can write a well-informed commit > message. > > Thanks, > > Steve. > > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
