Matthew Woehlke wrote: > I guess you mean that in a '..code-block:: cmake' block, kate should > apply the CMake HL rules? (What about other languages; I guess the same > argument would apply to e.g. C++, Python, etc?)
Kate already does that, since my recent patches to the cmake rst highlighting rules. Here's some html exports from kate: http://www.steveire.com/cmake-buildsystem.7.html http://www.steveire.com/cmake-developer.7.html http://www.steveire.com/source_group.html I only mapped c++ and cmake highlighting between rst names and kate names though. http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kate.git&a=commitdiff&h=a87a68668 Mappings for other languages could be added. A more-general way of doing the mapping would be nice, but Milian told me such a thing does not currently exist in kate. > (Or do you mean that the CMake HL also doesn't mark the previous example > as invalid? ...which it doesn't.) Kate does not mark the source_group signature linked above as invalid. It can color this invalid/valid preprocessor code with c++ highlighting error detection. http://www.steveire.com/main.html (it underlines in kate too, but that is not exported to html. kate bug apparently) It should be possible to get some rules for highlighting invalid cmake code into the kate cmake.xml too. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
